Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 27;34(9):e68.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e68. eCollection 2019 Mar 11.

Addition of Cervical Elastography May Increase Preterm Delivery Prediction Performance in Pregnant Women with Short Cervix: a Prospective Study

Hyun Soo Park  1 , Hayan Kwon  1 , Dong Wook Kwak  2   3 , Moon Young Kim  2 , Hyun-Joo Seol  4 , Joon-Seok Hong  5 , Jae-Yoon Shim  6 , Sae-Kyung Choi  7 , Han-Sung Hwang  8 , Min Jeong Oh  9 , Geum Joon Cho  9 , Kunwoo Kim  10 , Soo-Young Oh  11 ; Korean Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology Research Group
Affiliations

Addition of Cervical Elastography May Increase Preterm Delivery Prediction Performance in Pregnant Women with Short Cervix: a Prospective Study

Hyun Soo Park et al. J Korean Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background: We investigated whether there is a difference in elastographic parameters between pregnancies with and without spontaneous preterm delivery (sPTD) in women with a short cervix (≤ 25 mm), and examined the ability of elastographic parameters to predict sPTD in those women.

Methods: E-CervixTM (WS80A; Samsung Medison, Seoul, Korea) elastography was used to examine the cervical strain. Elastographic parameters were compared between pregnancies with and without sPTD. Diagnostic performance of elastographic parameters to predict sPTD ≤ 37 weeks, both alone and in combination with other parameters, was compared with that of cervical length (CL) using area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis.

Results: A total of 130 women were included. Median gestational age (GA) at examination was 24.4 weeks (interquartile range, 21.4-28.9), and the prevalence of sPTD was 20.0% (26/130). Both the elastographic parameters and CL did not show statistical difference between those with and without sPTD. However, when only patients with CL ≥ 1.5 cm (n = 110) were included in the analysis, there was a significant difference between two groups in elasticity contrast index (ECI) within 0.5/1.0/1.5 cm from the cervical canal (P < 0.05) which is one of elastographic parameters generated by E-Cervix. When AUC analysis was performed in women with CL ≥ 1.5 cm, the combination of parameters (CL + pre-pregnancy body mass index + GA at exam + ECI within 0.5/1.0/1.5 cm) showed a significantly higher AUC than CL alone (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: An addition of cervical elastography may improve the ability to predict sPTD in women with a short CL between 1.5 and 2.5 cm.

Keywords: Elastography; Pregnancy; Preterm Delivery; Short Cervix; Strain; Ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Measurements and ROI definitions in elastography images. (A) CL measurement using 6-MHz transvaginal probe in B-mode ultrasonography. Measurement areas of E-Cervix. (B) Strain values of the IOS and EOS are measured using a 1-cm radius from IOS, and EOS, respectively. (C) Values of strain mean, hardness ratio, and ECI are measured from within 0.5/1.0/1.5 cm area of the cervical canal. The patient agreed to publication of the elastography image of the uterine cervix.
ROI = regions of interest, CL = cervical length, IOS = internal os of cervix, EOS = external os of cervix, ECI = elasticity contrast index.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. E-Cervix elastography image generation processes. (A) Flow diagram of E-Cervix elastography measurements. (B) E-Cervix elastography image generation by multiple frames.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Receiver operating characteristic curve using the predicted probability calculated from the logistic regression model using CL, pre-pregnancy BMI, GA at CL measurement, and parameters of ECI within 1.5 cm from the cervical canal.
AUC = area under receiver operating characteristic curve, BMI = body mass index, CL = cervical length, GA at CL = gestational age at cervical length measurement, ECI = elasticity contrast index.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2162–2172. - PubMed
    1. Choi SJ. Use of progesterone supplement therapy for prevention of preterm birth: review of literatures. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2017;60(5):405–420. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ouh YT, Park JH, Ahn KH, Hong SC, Oh MJ, Kim HJ, et al. Recurrent risk of preterm birth in the third pregnancy in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33(24):e170. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(9):567–572. - PubMed
    1. Berghella V, Palacio M, Ness A, Alfirevic Z, Nicolaides KH, Saccone G. Cervical length screening for prevention of preterm birth in singleton pregnancy with threatened preterm labor: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(3):322–329. - PubMed