Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 4:2019:8271871.
doi: 10.1155/2019/8271871. eCollection 2019.

Association of Autoantibodies against M2-Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor with Atrial Fibrosis in Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Affiliations

Association of Autoantibodies against M2-Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor with Atrial Fibrosis in Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Guiling Ma et al. Cardiol Res Pract. .

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the association of serum autoantibodies against M2-muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (anti-M2-R) with atrial fibrosis in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.

Methods: Twenty-four long-standing persistent AF patients, scheduled to undergo hybrid ablation surgery, were enrolled in the study. Twenty-six patients with sinus rhythm, scheduled to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, were enrolled into the non-AF group. We detected serum anti-M2-R levels. Left atrial appendages were subjected to histological and molecular biological assays. Patients in the AF group received follow-up for two years.

Results: The AF group showed significantly higher serum anti-M2-R levels compared to the non-AF group (496.2 ± 232.5 vs. 86.3 ± 25.7 pmol/L, p < 0.001). The AF group exhibited severe fibrosis in the left atrial appendages, as indicated by increased collagen volume fraction (45.2 ± 4.7% vs. 27.6 ± 8.3%, p < 0.001), and higher levels of collagen I (0.52 ± 0.04 vs. 0.24 ± 0.06, p < 0.001) and collagen III (0.51 ± 0.07 vs. 0.36 ± 0.09, p < 0.001). TGF-β1 and CTGF were also upregulated in the AF group. A positive correlation between serum anti-M2-R levels and fibrosis of the left atrial appendage and fibrogenic indexes was observed.

Conclusions: Serum anti-M2-R levels are higher in AF patients and are associated with the severity of atrial fibrosis. In addition, serum anti-M2-R levels are positively correlated to TGF-β1 and CTGF expression in the left atrial appendage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison in serum anti-M2-R levels among three groups. The serum anti-M2-R level in the AF group was 496.2 ± 232.5 pmol/L, which was significantly higher than 86.3 ± 25.7 pmol/L in the non-AF group, p < 0.001. No difference in serum anti-M2-R levels between the non-AF and control group was observed (86.3 ± 25.7 vs. 82.4 ± 34.9 pmol/L, p=0.654).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Immunohistochemical analysis of M2 receptor, TGF-β1, and CTGF expression. Representative sections of the immunohistochemistry- (IHC-) stained left atrial appendage tissue of patients in the non-AF and AF group. (a) M2 receptor; (b) TGF-β1; (c) CTGF.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Western blotting analysis. Western blotting examined the left atrial appendage of patients in the non-AF group and the AF group. Left, representative western blot analysis the expression in the non-AF group and the AF group; right, quantitative results of the protein levels. ∗∗∗p < 0.001. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Correlation between serum anti-M2-R levels and fibrosis-related indexes. Pearson correlation analysis showed that M2 receptor, CVF, and collagen I and collagen III were all correlated with serum anti-M2-R levels (M2 receptor: r = 0.90, p < 0.001; CVF: r = 0.84, p < 0.001; collagen I: r = 0.87, p < 0.001; collagen III: r = 0.78, p < 0.001). Fibrogenic indexes were also correlated with serum anti-M2-R levels (TGF-β1: r = 0.92, p < 0.001; CTGF: r = 0.89, p < 0.001).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Histological analysis of the left atrial appendage. (a) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the left atrium appendage in the non-AF and the AF groups. Left, representative image; right, statistical results for the cell surface area. (b) Masson's trichrome staining of the left atrium appendage in the non-AF and AF groups. Left, representative image; right, quantification of the collagen volume fraction. ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Immunofluorescence analysis the expression of collagen I and collagen III. Immunofluorescence staining of the left atrial appendage of patients in the two groups. Left, representative image; right, statistical results for the collagen (a) I and (b) III. ∗∗∗p < 0.001; magnification, 400×.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chugh S. S., Havmoeller R., Narayanan K., et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2014;129(8):837–847. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.113.005119. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heeringa J., van der Kuip D. A. M., Hofman A., et al. Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study. European Heart Journal. 2006;27(8):949–953. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi825. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lloyd-Jones D. M., Wang T. J., Leip E. P., et al. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2004;110(9):1042–1046. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000140263.20897.42. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirchhof P., Benussi S., Kotecha D., et al. ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Europace. 2016;18:1609–1678. - PubMed
    1. Allessie M., Ausma J., Schotten U. Electrical, contractile and structural remodeling during atrial fibrillation. Cardiovascular Research. 2002;54(2):230–246. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(02)00258-4. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources