Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2019 Feb 3:2019:8191724.
doi: 10.1155/2019/8191724. eCollection 2019.

Presentation of Ocular Syphilis in a HIV-Positive Patient with False-Negative Serologic Screening

Affiliations
Case Reports

Presentation of Ocular Syphilis in a HIV-Positive Patient with False-Negative Serologic Screening

Mahsaw N Motlagh et al. Case Rep Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Purpose: The ocular sequelae of syphilis are devastating and may cause blindness. The ambiguous nature of its ocular manifestations makes syphilis difficult to detect. Though uncommon, the rise of syphilis in the United States requires a renewed understanding of its ophthalmic presentation to prevent devastating outcomes. We present this case to raise awareness for the increasing prevalence of ocular syphilis and appropriate serologic testing.

Observations: We describe a 65-year-old HIV-positive male with worsening retinitis, uveitis, and rapid visual loss. Initial lab results showed a nonreactive rapid plasma reagin (RPR) for syphilis. However, subsequent Treponema pallidum antibody testing was positive 48 hours after initial false-negative serologic screening. The patient had a rapid and successful recovery following treatment with penicillin.

Conclusions and importance: The incidence of syphilis is on the rise once again, and patients living with HIV are at increased risk. Ocular syphilis should be considered in susceptible populations in the clinical setting of retinitis, uveitis, and worsening visual loss with unknown cause. In addition, retesting for syphilis will decrease the prevalence of false-negative results, especially in patients with high clinical suspicion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Baseline imaging results. (a) Optical coherence tomography upon initial presentation was unremarkable. (b) Fluorescein angiography at the first visit revealed focal hyperfluorescence inferior to the optic nerve in the right eye (top) and vasculitis of the inferotemporal vessels in the left eye (bottom). (c) Fundus photos upon initial presentation. Normal retinal vessels in the right eye. Peripheral retinitis with white yellow necrotic retina and slight disc edema in the left eye.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Imaging results 21 days after initial presentation. (a) Optical coherence tomography of the right eye (top) showed vitreous debris with no evidence of subretinal fluid. The view of the left eye (bottom) was limited due to heavy vitreous debris. (b) Fluorescein angiography following visual decline. There are marked retinitis and vitreous debris in the right eye (top) and limited views due to heavy vitreous debris in the left eye (bottom). (c) Fundus photos revealed vitreous debris with 1+ vitritis and peripheral retinitis in the right eye. Heavy vitreous debris with 4+ vitritis causing limited views in the left eye.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Syphilis screening algorithms. Traditional serologic screening (a) compared to reverse sequence serologic screening (b). Screening algorithms adopted from CDC recommendations [3, 4]. RPR, rapid plasma reagin; TP-PA, Treponema pallidum particle agglutination; EIA, enzyme immunoassay; CIA, chemiluminescence immunoassay.

Similar articles

  • Ocular syphilis on the rise: a 10-year analysis from 2010 to 2020.
    Harvey J, Lee IJ, Lee CS, Hinkle D. Harvey J, et al. Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Dec;43(12):4419-4426. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02759-2. Epub 2023 Sep 29. Int Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 37773472
  • Ocular Syphilis: Our Experience in Selayang Hospital, Malaysia.
    Mohd Fadzil NI, Abd Hamid A, Muhammed J, Hashim H. Mohd Fadzil NI, et al. Cureus. 2022 Jul 8;14(7):e26655. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26655. eCollection 2022 Jul. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35949800 Free PMC article.
  • [A Case of Congenital Syphilis and Prozone Phenomenon].
    Appak Ö, Manyaslı M, Cengiz MM, Deliloğlu B, Karaoğlu Asrak H, Özlü C, Sayıner AA. Appak Ö, et al. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2019 Jul;53(3):336-342. doi: 10.5578/mb.68172. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2019. PMID: 31414635 Turkish.
  • [Ocular syphilis].
    Chiquet C, Khayi H, Puech C, Tonini M, Pavese P, Aptel F, Romanet JP. Chiquet C, et al. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2014 Apr;37(4):329-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Mar 18. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2014. PMID: 24655791 Review. French.
  • Ocular syphilis.
    Davis JL. Davis JL. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;25(6):513-8. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000099. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 25237932 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 2015. Atlanta, GA, USA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2016.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2015. Atlanta, GA, USA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2016.
    1. Centers for Disease. Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening—five laboratories, United States, 2006–2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2011;60:133–137. - PubMed
    1. Hoover K, Park I, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Reverse sequence syphilis screening: an overview by CDC. July 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/std/syphilis/syphilis-webinar-slides.pdf.
    1. Albini T., Callaway N. F., Pershing S., Wang S. K., Moshfeghi A. A., Moshfeghi D. M. Trends in hospitalization and incidence rate for syphilitic uveitis in the United States from 1998 to 2009. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2017;180:133–141. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.05.013. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources