Impact of hybrid FDG-PET/CT on gross tumor volume definition of cervical esophageal cancer: reducing interobserver variation
- PMID: 30864652
- PMCID: PMC6530614
- DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrz004
Impact of hybrid FDG-PET/CT on gross tumor volume definition of cervical esophageal cancer: reducing interobserver variation
Abstract
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy is being increasingly used to treat cervical esophageal cancer (CEC); however, delineating the gross tumor volume (GTV) accurately is essential for its successful treatment. The use of computed tomography (CT) images to determine the GTV produces a large degree of interobserver variation. In this study, we evaluated whether the use of [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/CT fused images reduced interobserver variation, compared with CT images alone, to determine the GTV in patients with CEC. FDG-PET/CT scans were obtained for 10 patients with CEC, imaged positioned on a flat tabletop with a pillow. Five radiation oncologists independently defined the GTV for the primary tumors using routine clinical data; they contoured the GTV based on CT images (GTVCT), followed by contouring based on FDG-PET/CT fused images (GTVPET/CT). To determine the geometric observer variation, we calculated the conformality index (CI) from the ratio of the intersection of the GTVs to their union. The interobserver CI was compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test. The mean (±SD) interobserver CIs of GTVCT and GTVPET/CT were 0.39 ± 0.15 and 0.58 ± 0.10, respectively (P = 0.005). Our results suggested that FDG-PET/CT images reduced interobserver variation when determining the GTV in patients with CEC. FDG-PET/CT may increase the consistency of the radiographically determined GTV in patients with CEC.
Keywords: esophageal cancer; gross tumor volume; intensity-modulated radiation therapy; positron emission tomography; radiation therapy; radiotherapy planning.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
Figures
References
-
- Hoeben A, Polak J, Van De Voorde L et al. . Cervical esophageal cancer: a gap in cancer knowledge. Ann Oncol 2016;27:1664–74. - PubMed
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers (Version 2.2018). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx (15 November 2018, date last accessed).
-
- Zenda S, Kojima T, Kato K et al. . Multicenter Phase 2 study of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with concurrent radiation therapy as an organ preservation approach in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervical esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016;96:976–84. - PubMed
-
- Fenkell L, Kaminsky I, Breen S et al. . Dosimetric comparison of IMRT vs. 3D conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer of the cervical esophagus. Radiother Oncol 2008;89:287–91. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
