Philosophical bias is the one bias that science cannot avoid
- PMID: 30864947
- PMCID: PMC6415937
- DOI: 10.7554/eLife.44929
Philosophical bias is the one bias that science cannot avoid
Abstract
Scientists seek to eliminate all forms of bias from their research. However, all scientists also make assumptions of a non-empirical nature about topics such as causality, determinism and reductionism when conducting research. Here, we argue that since these 'philosophical biases' cannot be avoided, they need to be debated critically by scientists and philosophers of science.
Keywords: bias; philosophy of biology; philosophy of science.
© 2019, Andersen et al.
Conflict of interest statement
FA, RA, ER No competing interests declared
References
-
- Anjum RL, Mumford S. Emergence and demergence. In: Paoletti M, Orilia F, editors. Philosopical and Scientific Perspectives on Downward Causation. Routledge; 2017. pp. 92–109. - DOI
-
- Anjum RL, Mumford S. Causation in Science and the Methods of Scientific Discovery. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018. - DOI
-
- Douglas H. Inductive risk and values in science. Philosophy of Science. 2000;67:559–579. doi: 10.1086/392855. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources