Outcomes of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Application in Corneal Thinning and Perforation
- PMID: 30865049
- PMCID: PMC6517072
- DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001919
Outcomes of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Application in Corneal Thinning and Perforation
Abstract
Purpose: To report the outcomes of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (CTA) application in corneal thinning and perforation.
Methods: A retrospective interventional case series of 137 patients receiving CTA for corneal thinning and perforation in 140 eyes between 2001 and 2018 at a single center was reviewed. Success rate and factors associated with glue failure were analyzed.
Results: Median age of the cohort was 63 years and 69 (50%) were women. One hundred fifteen patients (84%) had at least 1 systemic condition, 46 (34%) had autoimmune diseases. Eighty-nine eyes (64%) presented with perforation and 51 (36%) with thinning. The perforation/thinning was central/paracentral in 82 eyes (59%) and peripheral in 57 eyes (41%). Median size of perforation was 3.1 mm. Causes of perforation and thinning were microbial infection in 75 (55%), sterile melt in 49 (35%), laceration in 10, and keratoprosthesis melt in 8 eyes. Median glue retention was 58 days. Success rate of glue application (defined as intact globe without surgical intervention) was 72%, 61%, and 46% at 10, 30, and 90 days after glue application, respectively. Larger size of perforation/thinning, perforation (vs. thinning), and single glue application (vs. multiple) were correlated with higher failure rate. Systemic conditions, use of topical corticosteroid, etiologies, and location of perforation/thinning were not significantly correlated with glue failure.
Conclusions: CTA application was moderately effective in stabilizing corneal perforation and thinning in the very short-term. Multiple applications are often required. Maintenance of globe integrity after glue application decreases with time and the need for surgical intervention remains high.
Figures
Comment in
-
Anterior lens capsule: Biological drape.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar;71(3):1012-1015. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2629_22. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36872729 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Portnoy SL, Insler MS, and Kaufman HE, Surgical management of corneal ulceration and perforation. Surv Ophthalmol 1989; 34: 47–58. - PubMed
-
- Lekskul M, Fracht HU, Cohen EJ, et al., Nontraumatic corneal perforation. Cornea 2000; 19: 313–9. - PubMed
-
- Jhanji V, Young AL, Mehta JS, et al., Management of corneal perforation. Surv Ophthalmol 2011; 56: 522–38. - PubMed
-
- Guhan S, Peng SL, Janbatian H, et al., Surgical adhesives in ophthalmology: history and current trends. Br J Ophthalmol 2018; 102: 1328–1335. - PubMed
-
- Mattamal GJ, US FDA perspective on the regulations of medical-grade polymers: cyanoacrylate polymer medical device tissue adhesives. Expert Rev Med Devices 2008; 5: 41–9. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
