Effects of assisted reproductive technologies on transposon regulation in the mouse pre-implanted embryo
- PMID: 30865273
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez020
Effects of assisted reproductive technologies on transposon regulation in the mouse pre-implanted embryo
Abstract
Study question: Do assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) impact on the expression of transposable elements (TEs) in preimplantation embryos?
Summary answer: The expression of all TE families is globally increased with mouse embryo culture with differences according to culture medium composition.
What is known already: Mammalian genomes are subject to global epigenetic reprogramming during early embryogenesis. Whether ARTs could have consequences on this period of acute epigenetic sensitivity is the matter of intense research. So far, most studies have examined the impact of ARTs on the regulation of imprinted genes. However, very little attention has been given to the control of TEs, which exceed by far the number of genes and account for half of the mammalian genomic mass. This is of particular interest as TEs have the ability to modulate gene structure and expression, and show unique regulatory dynamics during the preimplantation period.
Study design, size, duration: Here, we evaluated for the first time the impact of ART procedures (superovulation, in-vitro fertilisation and embryo culture) on the control of different TE types throughout preimplantation development of mouse embryos. We also made use of a mouse model carrying a LINE-1 retrotransposition-reporter transgene to follow parental patterns of transmission and mobilisation.
Participants/materials, setting, methods: Hybrid B6CBA/F1 mice were used for the expression analyses. Relative TE expression was evaluated by using the nCounter quantification methodology (Nanostring®). This quantitative method allowed us to simultaneously follow 15 TE targets. Another technique of quantification (RTqPCR) was also used.A mouse model carrying a LINE-1 retrotransposition-reporter transgene (LINE-1 GF21) was used to follow parental patterns of transmission and mobilisation.
Main results and the role of chance: We found that the superovulation step did not modify the dynamics nor the level of TE transcription across the preimplantation period. However, upon in-vitro culture, TE expression was globally increased at the blastocyst stage in comparison with in-vivo development. Finally, by monitoring the transmission and mobilisation of a transgenic LINE-1 transposon, we found that in-vitro fertilisation may alter the mendelian rate of paternal inheritance.
Large scale data: N/A.
Limitations, reasons for caution: Even though the Nanostring results concerning the dynamics of transcription throughout preimplantation development were based on pools of embryos originating from several females, only two pools were analysed per developmental stage. However, at the blastocyst stage, consistent expressional results were found between the Nanostring technology and the other technique of quantification used, RTqPCR.
Wider implications of the findings: Our findings highlight the sensitivity of TEs to the ART environment and their great potential as biomarkers of culture medium-based effects.
Study funding/competing interest(s): This work was supported by funding from the 'Agence de la Biomedecine', 'Conseil Régional de Bourgogne' and 'RCT grant from INSERM-DGOS'. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Keywords: assisted reproductive technologies; embryo culture; ovarian stimulation; preimplantation development; transposable elements.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
TEAD4 regulates trophectoderm differentiation upstream of CDX2 in a GATA3-independent manner in the human preimplantation embryo.Hum Reprod. 2022 Jul 30;37(8):1760-1773. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac138. Hum Reprod. 2022. PMID: 35700449
-
Assessment of 'one-step' versus 'sequential' embryo culture conditions through embryonic genome methylation and hydroxymethylation changes.Hum Reprod. 2016 Nov;31(11):2471-2483. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew214. Epub 2016 Sep 22. Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 27664206 Free PMC article.
-
Do assisted reproductive technologies and in vitro embryo culture influence the epigenetic control of imprinted genes and transposable elements in children?Hum Reprod. 2021 Jan 25;36(2):479-492. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa310. Hum Reprod. 2021. PMID: 33319250
-
Retrospective analysis: reproducibility of interblastomere differences of mRNA expression in 2-cell stage mouse embryos is remarkably poor due to combinatorial mechanisms of blastomere diversification.Mol Hum Reprod. 2018 Jul 1;24(7):388-400. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gay021. Mol Hum Reprod. 2018. PMID: 29746690
-
Time to take human embryo culture seriously.Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2174-82. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew157. Epub 2016 Aug 23. Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 27554442 Review.
Cited by
-
Higher incidence of embryonic defects in mouse offspring conceived with assisted reproduction from fathers with sperm epimutations.Hum Mol Genet. 2023 Dec 12;33(1):48-63. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddad160. Hum Mol Genet. 2023. PMID: 37740387 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of superovulation and in vitro fertilization on LINE-1 copy number and telomere length in C57BL/6 J mice blastocysts.Mol Biol Rep. 2022 Jun;49(6):4909-4917. doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07351-y. Epub 2022 Mar 22. Mol Biol Rep. 2022. PMID: 35316424
-
Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Buccal Cells of Children Conceived through IVF and ICSI.Genes (Basel). 2021 Nov 28;12(12):1912. doi: 10.3390/genes12121912. Genes (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34946866 Free PMC article.
-
Binding of zebrafish lipovitellin and L1‑ORF2 increases the accessibility of L1‑ORF2 via interference with histone wrapping.Int J Mol Med. 2025 Jan;55(1):2. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2024.5443. Epub 2024 Oct 25. Int J Mol Med. 2025. PMID: 39450563 Free PMC article.
-
Control of LINE-1 Expression Maintains Genome Integrity in Germline and Early Embryo Development.Reprod Sci. 2022 Feb;29(2):328-340. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00461-1. Epub 2021 Jan 22. Reprod Sci. 2022. PMID: 33481218 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials