Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 1;34(5):932-941.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez022.

A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of male infertility genes

Affiliations

A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of male infertility genes

Manon S Oud et al. Hum Reprod. .

Abstract

Study question: Which genes are confidently linked to human monogenic male infertility?

Summary answer: Our systematic literature search and clinical validity assessment reveals that a total of 78 genes are currently confidently linked to 92 human male infertility phenotypes.

What is known already: The discovery of novel male infertility genes is rapidly accelerating with the availability of next-generating sequencing methods, but the quality of evidence for gene-disease relationships varies greatly. In order to improve genetic research, diagnostics and counseling, there is a need for an evidence-based overview of the currently known genes.

Study design, size, duration: We performed a systematic literature search and evidence assessment for all publications in Pubmed until December 2018 covering genetic causes of male infertility and/or defective male genitourinary development.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: Two independent reviewers conducted the literature search and included papers on the monogenic causes of human male infertility and excluded papers on genetic association or risk factors, karyotype anomalies and/or copy number variations affecting multiple genes. Next, the quality and the extent of all evidence supporting selected genes was weighed by a standardized scoring method and used to determine the clinical validity of each gene-disease relationship as expressed by the following six categories: no evidence, limited, moderate, strong, definitive or unable to classify.

Main results and the role of chance: From a total of 23 526 records, we included 1337 publications about monogenic causes of male infertility leading to a list of 521 gene-disease relationships. The clinical validity of these gene-disease relationships varied widely and ranged from definitive (n = 38) to strong (n = 22), moderate (n = 32), limited (n = 93) or no evidence (n = 160). A total of 176 gene-disease relationships could not be classified because our scoring method was not suitable.

Large scale data: Not applicable.

Limitations, reasons for caution: Our literature search was limited to Pubmed.

Wider implications of the findings: The comprehensive overview will aid researchers and clinicians in the field to establish gene lists for diagnostic screening using validated gene-disease criteria and help to identify gaps in our knowledge of male infertility. For future studies, the authors discuss the relevant and important international guidelines regarding research related to gene discovery and provide specific recommendations for the field of male infertility.

Study funding/competing interest(s): This work was supported by a VICI grant from The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (918-15-667 to J.A.V.), the Royal Society, and Wolfson Foundation (WM160091 to J.A.V.) as well as an investigator award in science from the Wellcome Trust (209451 to J.A.V.).

Prospero registration number: None.

Keywords: clinical validity; gene panel; genetics; gene–disease relation; male infertility; next-generation sequencing; spermatogenic failure; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart showing our search and screening strategy to identify publications and genes eligible for clinical validity assessment in male infertility. GD, gene–disease relationships; AR, autosomal recessive; AD, autosomal dominant; XL, X-linked; YL, Y-linked.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Genetic studies in male infertility between 1958 and 2018. (A) Graphical overview of genetic studies in male infertility. (B) Graphical representation of type of genetic research in male infertility. (C) The use of Sanger sequencing and next-generation sequencing for the discovery of genes in male infertility. (D) Increase of genes linked to human male infertility. AZF, azoospermia factor; CNV, copy number variants.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Biological overview of the genetics of male infertility. The color of each gene indicates the amount of evidence: Brown: Definitive; Red: Strong; Orange: Moderate. GnRHR: GnRH receptor, LHCGR: LHCG receptor. A list of gene names and definitions is available in Supplementary Table SIX.

Comment in

References

    1. Barratt CL. Is there a robust future for research in reproduction? Mol Hum Reprod 2016;22:1–2. - PubMed
    1. Barratt CLR, Bjorndahl L, De Jonge CJ, Lamb DJ, Osorio Martini F, McLachlan R, Oates RD, van der Poel S, St John B, Sigman M et al. . The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance-challenges and future research opportunities. Hum Reprod Update 2017;23:660–680. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bombieri C, Seia M, Castellani C. Genotypes and phenotypes in cystic fibrosis and cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator-related disorders. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2015;36:180–193. - PubMed
    1. Borgmann J, Tuttelmann F, Dworniczak B, Ropke A, Song HW, Kliesch S, Wilkinson MF, Laurentino S, Gromoll J. The human RHOX gene cluster: target genes and functional analysis of gene variants in infertile men. Hum Mol Genet 2016;25:4898–4910. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Colaco S, Modi D. Genetics of the human Y chromosome and its association with male infertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2018;16:14. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms