Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a cephalometric appraisal
- PMID: 30865780
- PMCID: PMC6939645
- DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjz005
Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a cephalometric appraisal
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cephalometric outcome of bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) in individuals with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP).
Material and methods: The experimental group (EG) comprised 23 individuals (17 males and 6 females) with UCLP and a mean age of 11.7 years. At least 6 months after secondary alveolar bone grafting, Bollard miniplates were installed in the posterior region of the maxilla and in the anterior region of the mandible. Class III elastics were recommended to be worn for 24 hours/day for a mean time of 18 months. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was obtained before (T1) and after treatment (T2). The control group (CG) consisted of 23 individuals with UCLP matched by initial age and gender with the EG and without any orthopaedic or surgical intervention performed between T1 and T2. The interval between T1 and T2 observations was 18 months for both groups. Twenty-one cephalometric variables were analysed. Intra- and intergroup comparisons were performed using paired and independent t-tests, respectively (P < 0.05).
Results: BAMP caused a greater maxillary protrusion (SNA) and a greater decrease of Class III maxillomandibular discrepancy (ANB and Wits appraisal) compared with the CG. BAMP also caused a counterclockwise rotation of the occlusal plane (Occ Plane to FH) and an improvement in the molar relationship compared with controls.
Conclusions: BAMP therapy demonstrated a significant orthopaedic maxillary protraction and an improvement in the Class III skeletal pattern in UCLP.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Bone-anchored maxillary protraction long-term outcomes in UCLP.Angle Orthod. 2020 Sep 1;90(5):734-741. doi: 10.2319/121219-795.1. Angle Orthod. 2020. PMID: 33378483 Free PMC article.
-
Rationale and design for efficacy and safety evaluation of Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction (BAMP) for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate with skeletal anterior crossbite: a single-arm, open-label, non-randomised prospective study protocol.BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 1;12(9):e061831. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061831. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36581967 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of bone-anchored maxillary protraction on secondary alveolar bone graft status in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Nov;158(5):731-737. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.10.021. Epub 2020 Sep 16. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020. PMID: 32950337
-
Efficacy of Different Methods of Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction in Cleft Lip and Palate Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Craniofac Surg. 2023 May 1;34(3):875-880. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008972. Epub 2022 Aug 30. J Craniofac Surg. 2023. PMID: 36044271
-
Face mask therapy of preadolescents with unilateral cleft lip and palate.Angle Orthod. 1994;64(2):145-50. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0145:FMTOPW>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1994. PMID: 8010523 Review.
Cited by
-
Bone-anchored maxillary protraction long-term outcomes in UCLP.Angle Orthod. 2020 Sep 1;90(5):734-741. doi: 10.2319/121219-795.1. Angle Orthod. 2020. PMID: 33378483 Free PMC article.
-
Concept for the Treatment of Class III Anomalies with a Skeletally Anchored Appliance Fabricated in the CAD/CAM Process-The MIRA Appliance.Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 May 19;10(5):616. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10050616. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37237686 Free PMC article.
-
Cephalometric Predictors of Future need for Orthognathic Surgery in Korean Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Despite Long-term Use of Facemask with Miniplate.Korean J Orthod. 2021 Jan 15;51(1):43-54. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.1.43. Korean J Orthod. 2021. PMID: 33446620 Free PMC article.
-
Rationale and design for efficacy and safety evaluation of Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction (BAMP) for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate with skeletal anterior crossbite: a single-arm, open-label, non-randomised prospective study protocol.BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 1;12(9):e061831. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061831. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36581967 Free PMC article.
-
Retrognathic maxilla in individuals born with oral clefts is due to intrinsic factors and not only due to early surgical treatment.Angle Orthod. 2021 Mar 1;91(2):243-247. doi: 10.2319/060620-521.1. Angle Orthod. 2021. PMID: 33351889 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Semb G. (1991) A study of facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP Team. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 28, 1–21; discussion 46. - PubMed
-
- Eichenberger M., Staudt C.B., Pandis N., Gnoinski W. and Eliades T (2014) Facial attractiveness of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and of controls assessed by laypersons and professionals. European Journal of Orthodontics, 36, 284–289. - PubMed
-
- Trindade I.E., Bertier C.E. and Sampaio-Teixeira A.C (2009) Objective assessment of internal nasal dimensions and speech resonance in individuals with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate after rhinoseptoplasty. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 20, 308–314. - PubMed
-
- Trindade I.E., Gomes Ade O., Fernandes Mde B., Trindade S.H. and Silva Filho O.G (2015) Nasal airway dimensions of children with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 52, 512–516. - PubMed
-
- Tiemens K., Nicholas D. and Forrest C.R (2013) Living with difference: experiences of adolescent girls with cleft lip and palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 50, e27–e34. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous