Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 13;10(1):31.
doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0711-0.

Characterization of radiographers' mammography practice in five European countries: a pilot study

Affiliations

Characterization of radiographers' mammography practice in five European countries: a pilot study

Nicole Richli Meystre et al. Insights Imaging. .

Abstract

Objectives: This pilot study aimed to characterize and compare radiographers' mammography practice, including quality control and continuous professional development in five European countries.

Methods: Online survey was performed to collect data regarding participants' profile, institution's profile, mammography practice, quality control and continuous professional development. The questionnaire was sent to clinical radiographers working in Estonia, Finland, Norway, Portugal and Switzerland. Descriptive statistical and subgroup analyzes were performed.

Results: The amount of returned questionnaires was 140. Most respondents were female (92%), having radiography bachelor. The majority (89%) of radiographers was working with full-field digital mammography. The majority (97%) of mammography images were acquired using AEC, and half of the radiographers were using dose saving programmes suggested by the manufacturers. The most typical (50%) compression force ranged from 8 to 11 kg. Part of the radiographers (44%) did not know if their practice followed specific guidelines. The most challenging tasks in mammography identified by radiographers were patient positioning (86%), coping with pain (88%), managing anxiety (83%) and imaging breast implants (71%). The majority (88%) of the respondents undertook continuous professional development activities.

Conclusions: The mammography practice varies across the five countries. We found country-specific traits related to mammography image acquisition, patient-centered care and quality management procedures. The lack of evidence-based knowledge suggests the importance of well-designed studies on these topics. The variability found in this pilot study encourages radiographers to question their own practice and teachers to review and revise the training programmes. Validation in larger studies including more countries is needed.

Keywords: Challenges; Mammography; Professional practice; Quality control; Radiographer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests

The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents, which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use, which may be made of the information contained therein. The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Types of mammography equipment used by participants per country
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Criteria used by radiographers to assess the quality of clinical mammography images

References

    1. De Jong JD. Explaining medical practice variation: social organization and institutional mechanisms. Utrecht: NIVEL; 2008.
    1. Horio Monteiro R (2007) Images médicales entre art et science. Sociétés 95(1):97–108
    1. Carnett WG. Clinical practice guidelines: a tool to improve care. Qual Manag Health Care. 1999;8(1):13–21. doi: 10.1097/00019514-199908010-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Jong JD, Groenewegen PP, Spreeuwenberg P, Schellevis F, Westert GP (2010) Do guidelines create uniformity in medical practice? Soc Sci Med 70(2):209–216 - PubMed
    1. O'Malley AS, Clancy C, Thompson J, Korabathina R, Meyer GS (2004) Clinical practice guidelines and performance indicators as related—but often misunderstood—tools. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 30(3):163–171 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources