Curtailment of well child services by a local health department: impact on rural 2-year-olds
- PMID: 3086924
- PMCID: PMC1477694
Curtailment of well child services by a local health department: impact on rural 2-year-olds
Abstract
The impact of changes in the delivery of well child health services by a rural health department on the reported health status, immunization status, and patterns of health care use is evaluated for poor children born in 1981, when well child clinic services were reduced. Using birth certificate records, all 1981 resident births were enumerated for the case county in Maryland and for a demographically similar comparison county that had continued to operate health department well child clinics. Trained local interviewers tracked and interviewed mothers or guardians of the 1981 cohort. Data were obtained on 567 of 589 eligible children, reflecting a 96 percent response rate. Children in each county were defined as poor if their mothers reported receiving AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependent Children), food stamps, or medical assistance or reported annual household incomes of below +5,000. This poverty status indicator was significantly correlated with health department use in the comparison county. Findings indicate that mothers of poor children in both counties were as likely as mothers of nonpoor children to assess their 2-year-old's health status as good, to identify a regular source of preventive care, and to report complete immunizations for their toddler. Although many private physicians in the case county appear to be seeing poor children in their offices, the distribution of study children among physicians was highly skewed. Out of 19 physicians or health facilities in the case county, one pediatrician was reported as the primary source of pediatric care for 52 percent of the 2-year-olds, one-third of whom were poor. In contrast, no one physician or facility was reported as providing pediatric care for more than 10 percent of 2-year-olds in the comparison county. Findings are discussed in light of these differences in physician supply and practice patterns.
Similar articles
-
Factors influencing the use of primary care physicians and public health departments for childhood immunization.J Ky Med Assoc. 1993 Sep;91(9):394-8. J Ky Med Assoc. 1993. PMID: 8228581
-
Heat or eat: the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program and nutritional and health risks among children less than 3 years of age.Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1293-302. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2943. Pediatrics. 2006. PMID: 17079530
-
A profile of children with disabilities receiving SSI: highlights from the National Survey of SSI Children and Families.Soc Secur Bull. 2005-2006;66(2):21-48. Soc Secur Bull. 2005. PMID: 16878426
-
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. Pediatrics. 2003. PMID: 12777595
-
The Larimer County Children's Clinic. A public-private partnership to provide medical care to indigent children.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994 Jun;148(6):572-7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1994.02170060026004. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994. PMID: 8193679
Cited by
-
The role of state policies and programs in buffering the effects of poverty on children's immunization receipt.Am J Public Health. 1999 Feb;89(2):164-70. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.2.164. Am J Public Health. 1999. PMID: 9949743 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical