Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 14;21(3):e11296.
doi: 10.2196/11296.

User Experience of an App-Based Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Qualitative Interview Study

Affiliations

User Experience of an App-Based Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Qualitative Interview Study

Ina Asklund et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects 10%-39% of women. Its first-line treatment consists of lifestyle interventions and pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), which can be performed supervised or unsupervised. Health apps are increasing in number and can be used to improve adherence to treatments. We developed the Tät app, which provides a 3-month treatment program with a focus on PFMT for women with SUI. The app treatment was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial, which demonstrated efficacy for improving incontinence symptoms and quality of life. In this qualitative interview study, we investigated participant experiences of the app-based treatment.

Objective: This study aimed to explore women's experiences of using an app-based treatment program for SUI.

Methods: This qualitative study is based on telephone interviews with 15 selected women, with a mean age of 47 years, who had used the app in the previous randomized controlled trial. A semistructured interview guide with open-ended questions was used, and the interviews were transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed according to the grounded theory.

Results: The results were grouped into three categories: "Something new!" "Keeping motivation up!" and "Good enough?" A core category, "Enabling my independence," was identified. The participants appreciated having a new and modern way to access a treatment program for SUI. The use of new technology seemed to make incontinence treatment feel more prioritized and less embarrassing for the subjects. The closeness to their mobile phone and app features like reminders and visual graphs helped support and motivate the women to carry through the PFMT. The participants felt confident that they could perform the treatment program on their own, even though they expressed some uncertainty about whether they were doing the pelvic floor muscle contractions correctly. They felt that the app-based treatment increased their self-confidence and enabled them to take responsibility for their treatment.

Conclusions: Use of the app-based treatment program for SUI empowered the women in this study and helped them self-manage their incontinence treatment. They appreciated the app as a new tool for supporting their motivation to carry through a slightly challenging PFMT program.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01848938; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01848938 (Archived by WebCite at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01848938).

Keywords: grounded theory; mobile applications; pelvic floor muscle training; qualitative research; self-management; stress; urinary incontinence; women’s health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshots of the mobile app Tät version 1.9.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow of the randomized controlled study and the present interview study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haylen BT, de Ridder Dirk, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN, International Urogynecological Association. International Continence Society An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4–20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence: Fifth Edition. Arnhem, The Netherlands: EAU; 2013. Epidemiology of Urinary Incontinence (UI) other Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP), Anal Incontinence (AI)
    1. Ebbesen MH, Hunskaar S, Rortveit G, Hannestad YS. Prevalence, incidence and remission of urinary incontinence in women: longitudinal data from the Norwegian HUNT study (EPINCONT) BMC Urol. 2013 May 30;13:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-13-27. https://bmcurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2490-13-27 1471-2490-13-27 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siddiqui NY, Levin PJ, Phadtare A, Pietrobon R, Ammarell N. Perceptions about female urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jul;25(7):863–71. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2276-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lukacz ES, Santiago-Lastra Y, Albo ME, Brubaker L. Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Review. JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1592–1604. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12137.2658327 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data