Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2019 Apr;133(4):810-814.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003166.

Shared Decision-Making Framework for Pelvic Examinations in Asymptomatic, Nonpregnant Patients

Julie Chor  1 , Debra B Stulberg, Stephanie Tillman
Affiliations
Editorial

Shared Decision-Making Framework for Pelvic Examinations in Asymptomatic, Nonpregnant Patients

Julie Chor et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding whether to perform pelvic examinations for asymptomatic, nonpregnant patients. However, several professional organizations support the notion that health care providers should no longer recommend that asymptomatic patients receive a yearly pelvic examination. At minimum, health care providers must respect patients' autonomy in decision making around this examination and initiate a joint discussion about whether to proceed with a pelvic examination. Shared decision making is a model used in other aspects of medicine that can aid such discussions. This model recognizes two experts in these clinical encounters-the health care provider is the expert regarding medical information and the patient is the expert regarding their values, preferences, and lived experiences. When shared decision making is used, not only is each expert valued for their knowledge, but the power differential shifts to a shared power model. This commentary aims to educate about shared decision making, explain why shared decision making is appropriate to use when discussing whether to perform a pelvic examination, and provide a framework for using shared decision making in discussing whether to proceed with a pelvic examination with asymptomatic, nonpregnant patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. National Center for Health Statistics. National ambulatory medical care survey: 2015 state and national summary tables. Hyattsville (MD): NCHS; 2017.
    1. Bloomfield HE, Olson A, Greer N, Cantor A, MacDonald R, Rutks I, et al. Screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, average-risk adult women: an evidence report for a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:46–53.
    1. American Academy of Family Physicians. Screening pelvic exam. Clinical preventive service recommendation. Available at: https://www.aafp.org/patient-care/clinical-recommendations/all/screening.... Retrieved November 1, 2018.
    1. Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Pelvic examinations. SGO position statement. Available at: https://www.sgo.org/newsroom/position-statements-2/pelvic-examinations/. Retrieved November 1, 2018.
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force; Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Barry MJ, Davidson KW, et al. Screening for gynecologic conditions with pelvic examination: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 2017;317:947–53.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources