Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 12;16(5):892.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050892.

Alcohol Industry CSR Organisations: What Can Their Twitter Activity Tell Us about Their Independence and Their Priorities? A Comparative Analysis

Affiliations

Alcohol Industry CSR Organisations: What Can Their Twitter Activity Tell Us about Their Independence and Their Priorities? A Comparative Analysis

Nason Maani Hessari et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

There are concerns about the accuracy of the health information provided by alcohol industry (AI)-funded organisations and about their independence. We conducted a content analysis of the health information disseminated by AI-funded organisations through Twitter, compared with non-AI-funded charities, to assess whether their messages align with industry and/or public health objectives. We compared all tweets from 2016 from Drinkaware (UK); Drinkaware.ie (Ireland); and DrinkWise (Australia), to non-AI-funded charities Alcohol Concern (UK), Alcohol Action Ireland, and FARE (Australia). Industry-funded bodies were significantly less likely to tweet about alcohol marketing, advertising and sponsorship; alcohol pricing; and physical health harms, including cancers, heart disease and pregnancy. They were significantly more likely to tweet about behavioural aspects of drinking and less likely to mention cancer risk; particularly breast cancer. These findings are consistent with previous evidence that the purpose of such bodies is the protection of the alcohol market, and of the alcohol industry's reputation. Their messaging strongly aligns with AI corporate social responsibility goals. The focus away from health harms, particularly cancer, is also consistent with previous evidence. The evidence does not support claims by these alcohol-industry-funded bodies about their independence from industry.

Keywords: alcohol industry; cancer; public health; social media; thematic analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. Barry A.E., Goodson P. Use (and misuse) of the responsible drinking message in public health and alcohol advertising: A review. Health Educ. Behav. 2010;37:288–303. doi: 10.1177/1090198109342393. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maani Hessari N., Petticrew M. What does the alcohol industry mean by ‘Responsible drinking’? A comparative analysis. J. Public Health. 2018;40:90–97. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx040. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller P.G., de Groot F., McKenzie S., Droste N. Vested interests in addiction research and policy. Alcohol industry use of social aspect public relations organizations against preventative health measures. Addiction. 2011;106:1560–1567. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03499.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCambridge J., Kypri K., Miller P., Hawkins B., Hastings G. Be aware of Drinkaware. Addiction. 2014;109:519–524. doi: 10.1111/add.12356. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Babor T.F., Robaina K., Brown K., Noel J., Cremonte M., Pantani D., Peltzer R.I., Pinsky I. Is the alcohol industry doing well by ‘doing good’? Findings from a content analysis of the alcohol industry’s actions to reduce harmful drinking. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e024325. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024325. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources