Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Mar 19;8(6):e008626.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008626.

High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin After Cardiac Stress Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin After Cardiac Stress Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Eslam Samaha et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background The recent introduction of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays has allowed clinicians to measure hs-cTn before and after cardiac stress testing, but the hs-cTn release pattern and potential utility in identifying inducible myocardial ischemia are unclear. We thus conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to improve our understanding of hs-cTn release associated with exercise and pharmacological stress testing. Methods and Results Studies published between January 2008 and July 2016 that reported hs-cTn change values (high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [hs-cTnT] or high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I [hs-cTnI]) in relation to cardiac stress testing were searched and reviewed by 2 independent screeners. Primary outcomes were pooled estimates of absolute and relative hs-cTn changes after cardiac stress test, stratified by the presence of inducible myocardial ischemia. This meta-analysis included 11 studies (n=2432 patients). After exercise stress testing, hs-cTnT increased by 0.5 ng/L or 11% (6 studies, n=406) and hs-cTnI by 2.4 ng/L or 41% (4 studies, n=365) in patients with inducible myocardial ischemia versus hs-cTnT by 1.1 ng/L or 18% (8 studies, n=629; P=0.29) and hs-cTnI by 1.8 ng/L or 72% (4 studies, n=831; P=0.61) in patients who did not develop inducible myocardial ischemia. After pharmacological stress test, hs-cTnT changed by -0.1 ng/L or -0.4% (6 studies, n=251) and hs-cTnI by 2.4 ng/L or 32% (2 studies, n=108) in patients with inducible myocardial ischemia versus hs-cTnT by 0.7 ng/L or 11% (5 studies, n=443, P=0.44) and hs-cTnI by 1.7 ng/L or 38% (2 studies, n=116; P=0.62) in patients who did not develop inducible myocardial ischemia. Conclusions hs-cTn rising patterns after exercise and pharmacological stress testing appear inconsistent and comparably small, and do not appear to be correlated with inducible myocardial ischemia.

Keywords: myocardial ischemia; stress echocardiography; stress testing; troponin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram summarizing study identification and selection. hs‐cTn indicates high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin.

References

    1. Sherwood MW, Newby KL. High‐sensitivity troponin assays: evidence, indications, and reasonable use. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:e000403 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000403 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aagaard P, Sahlen A, Bergfeldt L, Braunschweig F. Heart rate and its variability in response to running‐associations with troponin. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46:1624–1630. - PubMed
    1. Axelsson A, Ruwald MH, Dalsgaard M, Rossing K, Steffensen R, Iversen K. Serial measurements of high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin T after exercise stress test in stable coronary artery disease. Biomarkers. 2013;18:304–309. - PubMed
    1. Baker P, Davies SL, Larkin J, Moult D, Benton S, Roberts A, Harris T. Changes to the cardiac biomarkers of non‐elite athletes completing the 2009 London Marathon. Emerg Med J. 2014;31:374–379. - PubMed
    1. Pastormerlo LE, Agazio A, Benelli E, Gabutti A, Poletti R, Prontera C, Clerico A, Emdin M, Passino C. Usefulness of high‐sensitive troponin elevation after effort stress to unveil vulnerable myocardium in patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116:567–572. - PubMed

Publication types