Access to contraception in local health departments, four Midwest states, 2017-2018
- PMID: 30871935
- PMCID: PMC6548685
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.02.009
Access to contraception in local health departments, four Midwest states, 2017-2018
Abstract
Objective: Describe contraception availability at local health departments (LHDs) serving largely rural populations.
Study design: We invited administrators at LHDs located in four Midwest states to participate in an online survey conducted from September 2017-April 2018. We collected data on clinic staffing, patient population, receipt of Title X funds, and services provided to assess the proportion of LHDs providing any prescription method of contraception; secondary outcomes included healthcare staff training level and other reproductive health services provided.
Results: Of 344 LHDs invited, 237 administrators completed the survey (68.9%). Three-quarters served rural populations. One-third (34.6%) provided short-acting hormonal contraception; however, availability varied by state (Kansas: 58.0%, 40/69; Missouri: 37.5%, 33/88; Nebraska: 16.7%, 3/18; Iowa: 9.7%, 6/62; p<.01). Only 8.4% of LHDs provided IUDs; 7.6% provided implants, and 5.9% provided both methods. LHDs in Nebraska and Kansas provided any long-acting method more frequently (Kansas: 17.4%, Nebraska: 16.7%, Iowa: 8.1%, Missouri: 4.6%; p=.04). LHDs receiving Title X funds (27.0%) were much more likely to provide any prescription contraception (85.1% vs. 14.2%, p<.01). Most LHDs relied on registered nurses (RNs) to provide medical care; 81.0% reported that RNs provided care≥20 days per month. Pregnancy testing was widely available in Missouri and Kansas (>87%) and less commonly available in Iowa and Nebraska (<18%) (p<.01).
Conclusion: LHDs in these states are currently ill-equipped to offer comprehensive contraceptive services. Women seeking care at LHDs have limited, if any, contraceptive options.
Implications: Local health departments in the Midwest, serving a largely rural population, rarely offer prescription contraception, especially long-acting reversible methods. Women residing in settings without broad access to publicly-funded healthcare providers may have limited access to comprehensive contraceptive services. Efforts to ensure rural access are needed.
Keywords: Contraception; Family planning; IUD; Implant; Local health departments; Title X.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations of interest: none.
References
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Access to contraception. Committee Opinion No. 615. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:250–5. - PubMed
-
- Ricketts S, Klingler G, Schwalberg R. Game change in Colorado: widespread use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low-income women. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014;46(3):125–132. - PubMed
-
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Taking the Unintended Out of Pregnancy: Colorado’s Success with Long-Acting Reversible Contraception, January 2017, https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/PSD_TitleX3_CFPI-Re..., Accessed on January 30, 2019.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
