Ergodicity is sufficient but not necessary for group-to-individual generalizability
- PMID: 30872469
- PMCID: PMC6452692
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1818675116
Ergodicity is sufficient but not necessary for group-to-individual generalizability
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Comment in
-
Reply to Adolf and Fried: Conditional equivalence and imperatives for person-level science.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):6542-6543. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820221116. Epub 2019 Mar 14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019. PMID: 30872468 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 3;115(27):E6106-E6115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711978115. Epub 2018 Jun 18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018. PMID: 29915059 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Molenaar PCM, Campbell CG. The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009;18:112–117.
-
- Voelkle MC, Brose A, Schmiedek F, Lindenberger U. Toward a unified framework for the study of between-person and within-person structures: Building a bridge between two research paradigms. Multivariate Behav Res. 2014;49:193–213. - PubMed
-
- Brose A, Voelkle MC, Lövdén M, Lindenberger U, Schmiedek F. Differences in the between-person and within-person structures of affect are a matter of degree: Affect within and between individuals. Eur J Pers. 2015;29:55–71.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
