Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e025443.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025443.

Outcome of surgical repair of adult digital nerve injury: a systematic review

Rebecca L E Dunlop  1 , Justin Conrad Rosen Wormald  2 , Abhilash Jain  3   4
Affiliations

Outcome of surgical repair of adult digital nerve injury: a systematic review

Rebecca L E Dunlop et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: A systematic review to assess the evidence supporting surgical repair of digital nerve injury versus no repair in adults in terms of clinical outcomes.

Design: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review with methodology based on the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

Data sources: Databases included OvidMEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, clinicaltrials.gov and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, searched from inception until 10 November 2018.

Eligibility criteria: Adult digital nerve injury in which either direct repair or no repair was undertaken and an outcome measure was recorded.

Data extraction and synthesis: Study data extracted included demographics, injury type and extent, timing, treatment details, outcome data and time points, adverse outcomes, hand therapy and return to work. The National Institute of Health quality assessment tool for case series was used to assess risk of bias.

Results: Thirty studies were included. One compared surgical repair with non-repair. All studies were case series of between 15 and 110 nerve injuries, with heterogeneous patient, injury and treatment characteristics. Two studies detailed nerve repair without magnification. Static 2-point discrimination (s2PD) was the most commonly reported outcome measure. Return of protective sensation was achieved in most cases in the nerve repair and no nerve repair groups. Repair resulted in better s2PD than no repair, but <25% repaired nerves achieved normal levels. Adverse outcomes were similar between repair and no repair groups.

Conclusions: Only level IV evidence is available to support surgical repair of digital nerves in adults. Return of normal sensibility is uncommon and almost all unrepaired nerves regained protective sensation by 6 months and all patients declined further surgery. There was no difference in adverse outcomes. There is currently a lack of high-quality evidence to support surgical repair of digital nerve injuries in adults and further research is needed.

Prospero registration number: CRD42017065092.

Keywords: digital nerve; nerve injury; nerve repair.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses study attrition algorithm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Modified Highet classification of nerve recovery.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cheng AS. Use of early tactile stimulation in rehabilitation of digital nerve injuries. Am J Occup Ther 2000;54:159–65. 10.5014/ajot.54.2.159 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fakin RM, Calcagni M, Klein HJ, et al. . Long-term clinical outcome after epineural coaptation of digital nerves. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016;41:148–54. 10.1177/1753193415578986 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hohendorff B, Staub L, Fritsche E, et al. . [Sensory nerve function after unilateral digital vascular-nerve injury: nerve repair with and without arterial repair]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2009;41:306–11. 10.1055/s-0029-1238296 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lohmeyer JA, Sommer B, Siemers F, et al. . Nerve injuries of the upper extremity-expected outcome and clinical examination. Plast Surg Nurs 2009;29:88–93. 10.1097/01.PSN.0000356867.18220.73 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomas PR, Saunders RJ, Means KR. Comparison of digital nerve sensory recovery after repair using loupe or operating microscope magnification. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015;40:608–13. 10.1177/1753193414556006 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types