Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 1;146(3):635-645.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.32275. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

Radiation risk of incident colorectal cancer by anatomical site among atomic bomb survivors: 1958-2009

Affiliations

Radiation risk of incident colorectal cancer by anatomical site among atomic bomb survivors: 1958-2009

Hiromi Sugiyama et al. Int J Cancer. .

Abstract

Radiation effects on colorectal cancer rates, adjusted for smoking, alcohol intake and frequency of meat consumption and body mass index (BMI) by anatomical subsite (proximal colon, distal colon and rectum) were examined in a cohort of 105,444 atomic bomb survivors. Poisson regression methods were used to describe radiation-associated excess relative risks (ERR) and excess absolute rates (EAR) for the 1958-2009 period. There were 2,960 first primary colorectal cancers including 894 proximal, 871 distal and 1,046 rectal cancers. Smoking, alcohol intake and BMI were associated with subsite-specific cancer background rates. Significant linear dose-responses were found for total colon (sex-averaged ERR/Gy for 70 years old exposed at age 30 = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34; 0.98), proximal [ERR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.32; 1.44] and distal colon cancers [ERR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.04; 0.97], but not for rectal cancer [ERR = 0.023, 95% CI: -0.081; 0.13]. The ERRs for proximal and distal colon cancers were not significantly different (p = 0.41). The ERR decreased with attained age for total colon, but not for proximal colon cancer, and with calendar year for distal colon cancer. The ERRs and EARs did not vary by age at exposure, except for decreasing trend in EAR for proximal colon cancer. In conclusion, ionizing radiation is associated with increased risk of proximal and distal colon cancers. The ERR for proximal cancer persists over time, but that for distal colon cancer decreases. There continues to be no indication of radiation effects on rectal cancer incidence in this population.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; distal colon; ionizing radiation; proximal colon; radiation risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Background rates for total, proximal and distal colon cancers and rectal cancer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dose–response function for total colon cancer among the LSS subjects. Solid line shows the fitted linear sex‐averaged ERR dose–response. Points show ERR estimates with 95% confidence intervals by dose category. The ERRs are given for subjects at attained age of 70 years after exposure at age 30 years.

References

    1. Silver K, Greene T, Latowsky G. Cancer and workers exposed to ionizing radiation, a review of the research literature, vol. 34 Boston, MA: Center for Environmental Health Studies, 2003. 37.
    1. Kamran SC, Berrington De Gonzalez A, Ng A, et al. Therapeutic radiation and the potential risk of second malignancies. Cancer 2016;122:1809–21. - PubMed
    1. Nakatsuka H, Shimizu Y, Yamamoto T, et al. Colorectal cancer incidence among atomic bomb survivors, 1950‐80. J Radiat Res 1992;33:342–61. - PubMed
    1. Thompson DE, Mabuchi K, Ron E, et al. Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part II: solid tumors, 1958‐1987. Radiat Res 1994;137:S17–67. - PubMed
    1. Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958‐1998. Radiat Res 2007;168:1–64. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms