Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 15;33(3):302-306.
doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201810026.

[Short-term effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve and MBT implant]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations

[Short-term effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve and MBT implant]

[Article in Chinese]
Lingfei Guo et al. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate short-term effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve and MBT implant.

Methods: A clinical data of 23 patients (24 knees) who underwent revision TKA by using porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve combined with MBT implant between March 2015 and April 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 8 males (8 knees) and 15 females (16 knees). The age ranged from 48 to 85 years (mean, 65.4 years). The cause of revision TKA included infection in 14 knees, aseptic loosening in 8 knees, instability in 1 knee, and stiff knee in 1 knee. Bone defects were classified according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) bone defect classification. The femoral defect was rated as type ⅡA in 5 knees, type ⅡB in 17 knees, and type Ⅲ in 2 knees; the tibial defect was rated as type ⅡA in 2 knees, type ⅡB in 20 knees, and type Ⅲ in 2 knees. The mean time between primary TKA and revision TKA was 30.6 months (range, 6-86 months). The preoperative range of motion (ROM) was (56.0±24.9)°. The preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) total score was 41.9±14.2; and the pain and function scores were 8.5±5.2 and 33.4±13.5, respectively.

Results: All patients were followed up 12-39 months (mean, 25.6 months). The mean operation time was 2.2 hours (range, 1.6-2.9 hours). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 580 mL (range, 400-1 000 mL). There were 2 knees (8.3%) of intraoperative fracture associated with Sleeve insertion and 1 knee (4.2%) of acute postoperative infection at 25 days after revision TKA. All incisions healed by first intention. No deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity occurred. X-ray film showed that all implants were stable. At last follow-up, slight discomfort after exercise occurred in 4 knees (16.7%); end-of-stem pain in the tibia occurred in 1 knee (4.2%). The ROM was (114.6±5.1)°, which had significant improvement compared with the preoperative result ( t=11.698, P=0.000). The HSS total score (89.0±10.9), pain score (26.9±6.6), and function score (62.1±5.8) also had significant improvement compared with the preoperative results ( t=15.616, P=0.000; t=12.522, P=0.000; t=10.076, P=0.000).

Conclusion: The porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve combined with MBT implant in revision TKA has a significant improvement in short-term effectiveness and no signs of implant loosening.

目的: 探讨应用 Sleeve 金属袖套联合 MBT 假体行膝关节翻修术的早期疗效。.

方法: 回顾分析 2015 年 3 月—2017 年 4 月,应用 Sleeve 金属袖套联合 MBT 假体行膝关节翻修术的 23 例(24 膝)患者临床资料。男 8 例(8 膝),女 15 例(16 膝);年龄 48~85 岁,平均 65.4 岁。翻修原因:关节置换术后感染 14 膝,假体松动 8 膝,术后僵直 1 膝,术后关节不稳 1 膝。按照 Anderson 骨科研究所骨缺损分型标准(AORI):股骨侧ⅡA 型 5 膝、ⅡB 型 17 膝、Ⅲ型 2 膝;胫骨侧ⅡA 型 2 膝、ⅡB 型 20 膝、Ⅲ型 2 膝。初次人工全膝关节置换术至该次翻修术时间为 6~86 个月,平均 30.6 个月。膝关节活动度为(56.0±24.9)°;美国特种外科医院(HSS)评分总分为(41.9±14.2)分,疼痛及功能评分分别为(8.5±5.2)、(33.4±13.5)分。.

结果: 患者均获随访,随访时间 12~39 个月,平均 25.6 个月。手术时间 1.6~2.9 h,平均 2.2 h;术中出血量 400~1 000 mL,平均 580 mL。2 膝(8.3%)术中发生胫骨内侧轻微纵行劈裂,1 膝(4.2%)术后 25 d 出现急性感染。术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无下肢深静脉血栓形成发生。X 线片复查示假体稳定、无松动。末次随访时,4 膝(16.7%)活动后稍有不适,1 膝(4.2%)发生胫骨远端痛。末次随访时,膝关节活动度达(114.6±5.1)°,较术前明显改善( t=11.698, P=0.000)。HSS 总分、疼痛及功能评分分别为(89.0±10.9)、(26.9±6.6)、(62.1±5.8)分,均较术前显著提高( t=15.616, P=0.000; t=12.522, P=0.000; t=10.076, P=0.000)。.

结论: 膝关节翻修术中应用 Sleeve 金属袖套修复干骺端骨缺损,联合 MBT 假体可获得较好早期疗效。.

Keywords: MBT implant; Sleeve; Total knee arthroplasty; metaphyseal bone defect; revision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

图 1
图 1
Anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films of a 70-year-old male patient with left revision TKA because of infection 患者,男,70 岁,左膝关节置换术后感染行翻修术正侧位 X 线片

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. 贾承奇, 倪明, 付君, 等 人工全膝关节置换术中髌骨置换对疗效影响的比较研究. 中国修复重建外科杂志. 2018;32(4):394–399. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007;89(4):780–785. - PubMed
    1. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmire J, et al Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007;89 Suppl 3:144–151. - PubMed
    1. Engh GA, Ammeen DJ Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:167–175. - PubMed
    1. Whittaker JP, Dharmarajan R, Toms AD The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008;90(8):981–987. - PubMed