A comparison of oral flecainide and amiodarone for the treatment of recurrent supraventricular tachycardia in children

Abstract

Background: Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in children can be difficult to treat when first-line therapies (beta-blockade or digoxin) are not effective. Both flecainide and amiodarone are used as second-line therapies. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of flecainide and amiodarone in pediatric patients with recurrent SVT.

Methods: Pediatric patients treated with oral flecainide or oral amiodarone for SVT between 2006 and 2015 were studied. Tachycardia mechanisms included orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT), intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART), and ectopic atrial tachycardia (EAT). Outcomes were classified as full success, partial success (requiring additional intervention), or failure.

Results: Seventy-four patients were included (median age 46 days, range 1 day to 19 years). Flecainide was used in 47 patients and amiodarone in 27 patients. Full success was achieved in 68% and 59%, respectively (P = 0.28). Partial success was achieved in 13% and 19%, respectively (P = 0.12). Treatment failed in 19% and 22%, respectively (P = 0.97). Ten crossover patients received the second medication after the first failed. Of five amiodarone-to-flecainide crossovers, four achieved success on flecainide alone. Of five flecainide-to-amiodarone crossovers, two achieved success. Minor adverse events occurred in 9% of flecainide and 22% of amiodarone patients (P = 0.16). No significant differences were seen by arrhythmia subtype (36 EAT, 28 ORT, 10 IART), congenital heart disease (n = 38), or age group (56 infants).

Conclusions: Oral flecainide and amiodarone achieved meaningful arrhythmia control in 81% and 78% of pediatric patients with recurrent SVT, respectively. Those who failed amiodarone had encouraging outcomes when changed to flecainide.

Keywords: antiarrhythmic drug; pediatrics; pharmacology; supraventricular tachycardia.