How do doctors in the Netherlands perceive the impact of disciplinary procedures and disclosure of disciplinary measures on their professional practice, health and career opportunities? A questionnaire among medical doctors who received a disciplinary measure
- PMID: 30878977
- PMCID: PMC6429727
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023576
How do doctors in the Netherlands perceive the impact of disciplinary procedures and disclosure of disciplinary measures on their professional practice, health and career opportunities? A questionnaire among medical doctors who received a disciplinary measure
Abstract
Introduction: Disciplinary procedures can have serious consequences for the health, personal life and professional functioning of doctors. Until recently, specific disciplinary measures (reprimands) were publicly disclosed in the Netherlands. The perceived additional impact of disclosing reprimands on the professional and personal life of doctors is unclear.
Methods: All doctors who received a disciplinary measure from the Dutch Disciplinary Board between July 2012 and August 2016 were invited to partake in a 60-item questionnaire concerning the respondents' characteristics, the complaint, experience with the procedure and perceived impact of the procedure on health and professional functioning as reported by doctors themselves. The response rate was 43% (n=210). 21.4% received a reprimand (disclosed); the remainder received a warning (not disclosed). Differences between the two groups were calculated.
Results: Respondents with a reprimand reported significantly more negative experiences and impact on health and work than respondents with a warning. 37.8% of the doctors said their health was very good. A small percentage reported moderate-to-severe depressive complaints (3.6%), moderate-to-severe anxiety disorder (2%) or indications of burnout (10.8%). The majority reported changes in their professional practices associated with 'defensive medicine', such as doing more supplementary research (41%) and complying more with patients' wishes (35%).
Conclusion: The Dutch disciplinary procedure has strong negative side effects, that disclosing measures seems to increase. Dutch disciplinary law aims to contribute to the quality of professional practice. A safe environment is a basic condition for quality improvement and therefore, disclosure of disciplinary measures should be carefully considered. Disclosure of disciplinary measures has always been controversial and the results of this study has rekindled this debate. Recently, a majority in the Dutch House of Representatives has voted against disclosure of reprimands, leaving disclosure of reprimands a discretion of the disciplinary board when deemed appropriate or necessary.
Keywords: health policy; medical law; quality in health care; risk management.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Is the perceived impact of disciplinary procedures on medical doctors' professional practice associated with working in an open culture and feeling supported? A questionnaire among medical doctors in the Netherlands who have been disciplined.BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 26;10(11):e036922. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036922. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33243787 Free PMC article.
-
[Dutch medical disciplinary law cases concerning psychiatry, 2015-2019].Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2021;63(3):181-188. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2021. PMID: 33779972 Dutch.
-
Views of physicians, disciplinary board members and practicing lawyers on the new statutory disciplinary system for health care in The Netherlands.Health Policy. 2006 Jul;77(2):202-11. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.07.003. Epub 2005 Aug 24. Health Policy. 2006. PMID: 16125274
-
[An overview of 5 years of disciplinary measures imposed on psychiatrists].Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2020;62(5):351-357. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2020. PMID: 32484563 Review. Dutch.
-
[Disclosing medical errors: the current situation].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;159:A9089. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015. PMID: 26374725 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
Protective factors and sources of support in the workplace as experienced by UK foundation and junior doctors: a qualitative study.BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 23;11(6):e045588. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045588. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34162643 Free PMC article.
-
Alleged Malpractice in Orthopedic Surgery in The Netherlands: Lessons Learned from Medical Disciplinary Jurisprudence.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 7;11(24):3111. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11243111. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38132001 Free PMC article.
-
Is the perceived impact of disciplinary procedures on medical doctors' professional practice associated with working in an open culture and feeling supported? A questionnaire among medical doctors in the Netherlands who have been disciplined.BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 26;10(11):e036922. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036922. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33243787 Free PMC article.
-
Disciplinary complaints concerning transgressive behaviour by healthcare professionals: an analysis of 5 years jurisprudence in the Netherlands.BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 12;11(10):e053401. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053401. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34642199 Free PMC article.
-
Handling Complaints Related to Diagnostic Faults Before Disciplinary Bodies: Analysis of French Ordinal Jurisprudence.Cureus. 2025 Feb 24;17(2):e79564. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79564. eCollection 2025 Feb. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40144406 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Edrees HH, Paine LA, Feroli ER, et al. . Health care workers as second victims of medical errors. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2011;121:101–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources