Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 15;9(3):e023576.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023576.

How do doctors in the Netherlands perceive the impact of disciplinary procedures and disclosure of disciplinary measures on their professional practice, health and career opportunities? A questionnaire among medical doctors who received a disciplinary measure

Affiliations

How do doctors in the Netherlands perceive the impact of disciplinary procedures and disclosure of disciplinary measures on their professional practice, health and career opportunities? A questionnaire among medical doctors who received a disciplinary measure

Berber S Laarman et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Disciplinary procedures can have serious consequences for the health, personal life and professional functioning of doctors. Until recently, specific disciplinary measures (reprimands) were publicly disclosed in the Netherlands. The perceived additional impact of disclosing reprimands on the professional and personal life of doctors is unclear.

Methods: All doctors who received a disciplinary measure from the Dutch Disciplinary Board between July 2012 and August 2016 were invited to partake in a 60-item questionnaire concerning the respondents' characteristics, the complaint, experience with the procedure and perceived impact of the procedure on health and professional functioning as reported by doctors themselves. The response rate was 43% (n=210). 21.4% received a reprimand (disclosed); the remainder received a warning (not disclosed). Differences between the two groups were calculated.

Results: Respondents with a reprimand reported significantly more negative experiences and impact on health and work than respondents with a warning. 37.8% of the doctors said their health was very good. A small percentage reported moderate-to-severe depressive complaints (3.6%), moderate-to-severe anxiety disorder (2%) or indications of burnout (10.8%). The majority reported changes in their professional practices associated with 'defensive medicine', such as doing more supplementary research (41%) and complying more with patients' wishes (35%).

Conclusion: The Dutch disciplinary procedure has strong negative side effects, that disclosing measures seems to increase. Dutch disciplinary law aims to contribute to the quality of professional practice. A safe environment is a basic condition for quality improvement and therefore, disclosure of disciplinary measures should be carefully considered. Disclosure of disciplinary measures has always been controversial and the results of this study has rekindled this debate. Recently, a majority in the Dutch House of Representatives has voted against disclosure of reprimands, leaving disclosure of reprimands a discretion of the disciplinary board when deemed appropriate or necessary.

Keywords: health policy; medical law; quality in health care; risk management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. de Wit ME, Marks CM, Natterman JP, et al. . Supporting second victims of patient safety events: shouldn’t these communications be covered by legal privilege? J Law Med Ethics 2013;41:852–8. 10.1111/jlme.12095 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edrees HH, Paine LA, Feroli ER, et al. . Health care workers as second victims of medical errors. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2011;121:101–8. - PubMed
    1. Seys D, Scott S, Wu A, et al. . Supporting involved health care professionals (second victims) following an adverse health event: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 2013;50:678–87. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.07.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seys D, Wu AW, Van Gerven E, et al. . Health care professionals as second victims after adverse events: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof 2013;36:135–62. 10.1177/0163278712458918 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu AW. Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ 2000;320:726. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources