Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 May;73(5):983-989.
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12266.

Role of Coronary Artery Calcium for Stratifying Cardiovascular Risk in Adults With Hypertension

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Role of Coronary Artery Calcium for Stratifying Cardiovascular Risk in Adults With Hypertension

S M Iftekhar Uddin et al. Hypertension. 2019 May.

Abstract

We examined the utility of coronary artery calcium (CAC) for cardiovascular risk stratification among hypertensive adults, including those fitting eligibility for SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). Additionally, we used CAC to identify hypertensive adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality rates equivalent to those observed in SPRINT who may, therefore, benefit from the most intensive blood pressure therapy. Our study population included 16 167 hypertensive patients from the CAC Consortium, among whom 6375 constituted a "SPRINT-like" population. We compared multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios of coronary heart disease and CVD deaths by CAC category (0, 1-99, 100-399, ≥400). Additionally, we generated a CAC-CVD mortality curve for patients aged >50 years to determine what CAC scores were associated with CVD death rates observed in SPRINT. Mean age was 58.1±10.6 years. During a mean follow-up of 11.6±3.6 years, there were 409 CVD deaths and 207 coronary heart disease deaths. Increasing CAC scores were associated with increased coronary heart disease and CVD mortality (coronary heart disease-CAC 100-399: hazard ratio [95% CI] 1.88 [1.04-3.40], CAC ≥400: 4.16 [2.34-7.39]; CVD-CAC 100-399: 1.93 [1.31-2.83], CAC ≥400: 3.51 [2.40-5.13]). A similar increased risk was observed across 10-year atherosclerotic CVD risk categories and in the SPRINT-like population. A CAC score of 220 (confidence range, 165-270) was associated with the CVD mortality rate observed in SPRINT. CAC risk stratifies adults with hypertension, including those who are SPRINT eligible. A CAC score of 220 can identify hypertensive adults with SPRINT-level CVD mortality risk and, therefore, may be reasonable for identifying candidates for aggressive blood pressure therapy.

Keywords: blood pressure; calcium; cardiovascular disease; hypertension; risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Absolute CHD and CVD mortality rates among hypertensives in the CAC Consortium.
Absolute (A) coronary heart disease (CHD) and (B) cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality rates per 1000 person-years by ASCVD risk groups and CAC score categories. ASCVD indicates atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CAC, coronary artery calcium.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. CAC score equivalent of SPRINT-level risk among participants age >50 years
Graph shows the annual cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality rate as a function of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores among hypertensive patients age >50 years. Horizontal red line represents the age-adjusted CVD death rate observed in the SPRINT trial (0.35%/year). These lines intersect at CAC=270, with lower limit of confidence (accounting for possible 15% underestimation of risk in the CAC Consortium) at CAC=165.

References

    1. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: A report from the american heart association. Circulation. 2018;137(12):e492. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558 [doi]. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017. doi: S0735-1097(17)41519-1 [pii]. - PubMed
    1. Muntner P, Carey RM, Gidding S, et al. Potential U.S. population impact of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association High Blood Pressure Guideline. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017. doi: S0735-1097(17)41474-4 [pii].
    1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: The JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–2572. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560 [doi]. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, Whelton PK, et al. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. SPRINT Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2103–2116. 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms