Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018;35(4):483-505.
doi: 10.1007/s10437-018-9314-2. Epub 2018 Nov 10.

On the Origins and Dissemination of Domesticated Sorghum and Pearl Millet across Africa and into India: a View from the Butana Group of the Far Eastern Sahel

Frank Winchell  1 , Michael Brass  2 , Andrea Manzo  3 , Alemseged Beldados  4 , Valentina Perna  3 , Charlene Murphy  2 , Chris Stevens  2 , Dorian Q Fuller  2
Affiliations
Review

On the Origins and Dissemination of Domesticated Sorghum and Pearl Millet across Africa and into India: a View from the Butana Group of the Far Eastern Sahel

Frank Winchell et al. Afr Archaeol Rev. 2018.

Abstract
in English, French

Four decades have passed since Harlan and Stemler (1976) proposed the eastern Sahelian zone as the most likely center of Sorghum bicolor domestication. Recently, new data on seed impressions on Butana Group pottery, from the fourth millennium BC in the southern Atbai region of the far eastern Sahelian Belt in Africa, show evidence for cultivation activities of sorghum displaying some domestication traits. Pennisetum glaucum may have been undergoing domestication shortly thereafter in the western Sahel, as finds of fully domesticated pearl millet are present in southeastern Mali by the second half of the third millennium BC, and present in eastern Sudan by the early second millennium BC. The dispersal of the latter to India took less than 1000 years according to present data. Here, we review the middle Holocene Sudanese archaeological data for the first time, to situate the origins and spread of these two native summer rainfall cereals in what is proposed to be their eastern Sahelian Sudan gateway to the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean trade.

Quatre décennies se sont écoulées depuis que Harlan et Stemler ont proposé la zone sahélienne orientale comme le centre le plus probable de la domestication du sorgho bicolore. Récemment, de nouvelles données sur les impressions de semences sur les poteries du groupe Butana du IVe millénaire avant JC dans la région sud d’Atbai dans la ceinture sahélienne d’Afrique orientale montrent des preuves d’activités de culture du sorgho présentant certains traits de domestication. Pennisetum glaucum pourrait être en cours de domestication peu après dans l’ouest du Sahel, puisque le millet perlé entièrement domestiqué est. présent dans le sud-est du Mali vers la seconde moitié du troisième millénaire avant J.-C. et présent dans l’est du Soudan au début du deuxième millénaire avant notre ère. La dispersion de ce dernier en Inde a pris moins de mille ans selon les données actuelles. Nous examinons ici pour la première fois les données archéologiques soudanaises de l’Holocène moyen pour situer les origines et la propagation de ces deux céréales de pluie estivales indigènes dans ce qui est. proposé comme leur porte d’entrée soudanienne du Sahel oriental à la mer Rouge et à l’océan Indien.

Keywords: Archaeobotany; Butana Group; Nubia; Origins of agriculture; Pennisetum glaucum; Sorghum bicolor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with Ethical StandardsThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map of the archaeological distribution of sorghum and pearl millet finds in northern Africa up to AD 350. The median age of the earliest phase of occurrence for each site is represented. Wild forms are indicated in gray, domesticated morphology indicated in black. Sites: 1. Waladé; 2. Cubalel; 3. Dhar Tichitt; 4. Dhar Oualata; 5. Djiganyai; 6. Oued Chebbi; 7. Oued Bou Khzama; 8. Dia Shoma; 9. Ounjougou (Varves West); 10. Windé Koroji; 11. Karkarichinkat; 12. Boase B5C; 13. Birimi; 14. Oursi; 15. Ti-n-Akof; 16. Nok sites; 17. Bwambe-Sommet; 18. Aband Minko’o; 19. Ganjigana; 20. Mege; 21. Kursakata; 22. Boso-Njafo; 23. Ti-n-Torha/Two Caves; 24. Uan Tabu; 25. Takarkori; 26. Uan Muhuggiag; 27. Tinda B; 28. Zinchechra; 29. Jarma; 30. Farafra Oasis; 31. Abu Ballas; 32. Dakhleh Oasis; 33. Kharga Oasis; 34. Wadi Qitna; 35. Qasr Ibrim; 36. Nabta Playa; 37. Kawa; 38. Umm Muri; 39. Berenike; 40. Shenshef; 41. Dangeil; 42. Kasala; 43. Jebel Tomat; 44. Abu Geili; 45. Shaheinab; 46. El Kadada; 47. Meroe; 48. Hamadab; 49. El Zakiab; 50. Kadero; El Zakiab 51. El Mahalab; 52. Umm Direiwa; 53. Sheikh el Amin; 54. Sheikh Mustafa; 55. Shaqadud; 56. Jebel Qeili. (map: D.Q. Fuller)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Map of the Sudan, relating regions and sites discussed. The presence of sorghum in sites of various period is indicated. Sites: 1. Sai Island; 2. Kawa; 3. Umm Muri; 4. Dangeil; 5. Es Sour; 6. Meroe; 7. Hamadab; 8. El Kadada; 9. Sheheinab; 10. Geili; 11. El Zakiab; 12. Kadero; 13. Umm Direiwa; 14. El Mahalab; 15. Sheikh Mustafa; 16. Sheikh el Amin; 17. Jebel Qeli; 18. Jebel Tomat; 19. Rabak; 20. Jebel Moya; 21. Abu Geili
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Butana Group sites across the southern Atbai (from Winchell , Fig. 1.4)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Rim sherds of Classic Gash rim banded bowls and cups (from Manzo , Fig. 83)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Horizontally combed and grooved Jebel Mokram Group sherds (from Manzo , Fig. 85)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Quantitative summary of archaeological spikelet base data for early sorghum from eastern Saharan/Sahel regions, based on macro-remains from Nabta Playa (Wasylikowa and Dahlberg 1999) and impressions from Sudanese sites (Stemler , ; Abdel-Magid ; Winchell et al. ; Beldados et al. 2018). These sites are selected based on the presence of quantitative data on spikelet base morphology
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Chipped stone pick of the Butana Group (from Mbutu , Fig. 2.12; reproduced with permission)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
a and b Seed-chaff tempered ceramics (Khordhag Plain type) of the Butana Group. ([b] from Winchell , Fig. A.37)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abdel-Magid, A. (1989). Plant domestication in the Middle Nile Basin—An archaeobotanical case study. International Series 523. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.
    1. Abdel-Magid A. Exploitation of food-plants in the Early and Middle Holocene Blue Nile area, Sudan and neighbouring areas. Complutum. 2003;14:345–372.
    1. Allaby R. Integrating the processes in the evolutionary system of domestication. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2010;61:935–944. - PubMed
    1. Allaby R, Brown T, Fuller D. A simulation of the effect of inbreeding on crop domestication genetics with comments on the integration of archaeobotany and genetics: A reply to Honne and Heun. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany. 2010;9(2):151–158.
    1. Amblard S, Pernès J. The identification of cultivated pearl millet (Pennisetum) amongst plant impressions on pottery from Oued Chebbi (Dhar Oualata, Mauritania) African Archaeological Review. 1989;7:117–126.

LinkOut - more resources