Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 1:10:337.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00337. eCollection 2019.

Experimentally Induced Empathy Has No Impact on Generosity in a Monetarily Incentivized Dictator Game

Affiliations

Experimentally Induced Empathy Has No Impact on Generosity in a Monetarily Incentivized Dictator Game

Jan-Erik Lönnqvist et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

In a monetarily incentivized Dictator Game, we expected Dictators' empathy toward the Recipients to cause more pro-social allocations. Empathy was experimentally induced via a commonly used perspective taking task. Dictators (N = 474) were instructed to split an endowment of 10€ between themselves and an unknown Recipient. They could split the money 8/2 (8€ for Dictator, 2€ for Recipient) or 5/5 (5€ each). Although the empathy manipulation successfully increased Dictators' feelings of empathy toward the Recipients, Dictators' decisions on how to split the money were not affected. We had ample statistical power (above 0.99) to detect a typical social psychology effect (corresponding to r around 0.20). Other possible determinants of generosity in the Dictator Game should be investigated.

Keywords: altruism; dictator game; empathy; experimental economics; generosity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency of 8/2 and 5/5 choices in the empathy and in the control condition.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ames D. L., Jenkins A. C., Banaji A. C., Mitchell J. P. (2008). Taking another person’s perspective increases self-referential neural processing. Psychol. Sci. 19, 642–644. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02135.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andreoni J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Econ. J. 100, 464–477. 10.2307/2234133 - DOI
    1. Andreoni J., Miller J. H. (2002). Giving according to GARP: an experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica 70, 737–753. 10.1111/1468-0262.00302 - DOI
    1. Aquino K., Reed A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83, 1423–1440. 10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Artinger F., Exadaktylos F., Koppel H., Sääksvuori L. (2014). In others’ shoes: do individual differences in empathy and theory of mind shape social preferences? PLoS One 9:e92844. 10.1371/journal.pone.0092844, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources