Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 5;7(2):e2066.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002066. eCollection 2019 Feb.

The Modified Lateral Intercostal Artery Perforator Flap

Affiliations

The Modified Lateral Intercostal Artery Perforator Flap

Farid Meybodi et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Background: The main surgical options for treatment of breast cancer are breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy. BCS aims to achieve complete excision of the tumor while achieving a pleasing cosmetic result. Excision of tumors in the lateral aspect of the breast has been associated with issues such as contour deformities and asymmetry. Development of volume replacement techniques such as the lateral intercostal artery perforator flap (LICAP) aimed to address these issues. Our modification of the traditional LICAP offers a less visible scar, good access to the axilla, and no need to reposition the patient.

Methods: All patients undergoing a modified LICAP were identified from our database. The lateral intercostal artery perforators were marked with ultrasound and 2 "lazy S" lines were drawn to mark the flap. The wide local excision (with or without axillary surgery) was performed and the flap mobilized to fill the defect.

Results: Twenty-two patients underwent modified LICAP in 14 months. The mean specimen weight was 86 g. Four patients (18%) had a re-excision for positive margins. Nineteen patients had axillary surgery performed at the time of their modified LICAP flap. No patients had a scar that extended posterior to the posterior axillary line; no patients required a separate incision for axillary surgery; and no patients needed to be repositioned intraoperatively.

Conclusions: Our early experience with this innovative procedure has been favorable. The perioperative complication rate is low. Due to the relatively short follow-up, longer term outcomes such as postradiotherapy appearance are yet to be determined.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The original LICAP flap.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The progression in a modified LICAP flap.
Video Graphic 1.
Video Graphic 1.
See video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, which displays the modified lateral intercostal artery perforator flap. This video is available in the “Related Videos” section of the Full-Text article at PRSGlobalOpen.com or at http://links.lww.com/PRSGO/B32.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Preopetrative photographs, 25 mm invasive ductal carcinoma at right breast 9 o’clock.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Photographs 6 months post wide local excision and sentinel node biopsy (specimen weight 61 gr).

References

    1. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227 - PubMed
    1. Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, et al. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1375–1391. - PubMed
    1. Blondeel PN, Hijjawi J, Depypere H, et al. Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three-step principle. Part III–reconstruction following breast conservative treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:28–38. - PubMed
    1. Kaur N, Petit JY, Rietjens M, et al. Comparative study of surgical margins in oncoplastic surgery and quadrantectomy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:539–545. - PubMed
    1. Macmillan RD, James R, Gale KL, et al. Therapeutic mammaplasty. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:90–95. - PubMed