Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;8(1):10-18.
doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2018.11.13.

What happened in 133 consecutive hepatic artery reconstruction in liver transplantation in 1 year?

Affiliations

What happened in 133 consecutive hepatic artery reconstruction in liver transplantation in 1 year?

Tsan-Shiun Lin et al. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The immediate challenges during microvascular reconstruction of hepatic artery (HAR) during liver transplantation (LT) can be many. Hence, in order to give a cross sectional view of these problems this study over a period of 1 year, showing our routine practice, was taken up.

Methods: From January 2015 to December 2015, a total of 133 LTs were performed in Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. All hepatic artery (HA) reconstructions were performed by a microvascular surgeon under an operating microscope.

Results: In the 133 patients, one artery was anastomosed in 123 (92.5%) patients, two in 9 (6.8%) patients and three in 1 (0.7%) of the patient. Eleven (8.3%) arteries were less than 2 mm in size (1-1.9 mm). There were intimal dissections (IDs) involving either the donor or the recipient arteries of mild to severe nature in 9 (6.8%) patients. Immediately following graft arterial anastomosis, either there was no flow or an intraoperative hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) was found in nine (7.1%-8 LDLT, 4.8%-1 DDLT) patients. Immediate re-do anastomosis was done in all of these patients who did well in the follow-up. The overall post-operative success rate was 99.2%. One patient (0.8%) developed postoperative HAT due to infection during follow up and died due to sepsis.

Conclusions: Small vessels or HA injury are the frequently encountered problems by a micro vascular surgeon. The other problems could be ID, need to do multiple reconstructions, immediate HAT and ability to re-do the HAR immediately.

Keywords: Hepatic artery (HA); liver transplantation (LT); microvascular surgery; reconstruction; thrombosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bar chart showing the number of problematic cases. HAR, hepatic artery reconstruction; GEA, gastro epiploic artery.

Comment in

References

    1. Inomoto T, Nishizawa F, Sasaki H, et al. Experiences of 120 microsurgical reconstructions of hepatic artery in living related liver transplantation. Surgery 1996;119:20-6. 10.1016/S0039-6060(96)80208-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mori K, Nagata I, Yamagata S, et al. The introduction of microvascular surgery to hepatic artery reconstruction in living-donor liver transplantation—its surgical advantages compared with conventional procedures. Transplantation 1992;54:263-8. 10.1097/00007890-199208000-00014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hatano E, Terajima H, Yabe S, et al. Hepatic artery thrombosis in living related liver transplantation. Transplantation 1997;64:1443. 10.1097/00007890-199711270-00012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uchiyama H, Hashimoto K, Hiroshige S, et al. Hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: review of its techniques and complications. Surgery 2002;131:S200-4. 10.1067/msy.2002.119577 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lin TS, Chiang YC, Chen CL, et al. Intimal dissection of the hepatic artery following transarterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: an intraoperative problem in adult living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2009;15:1553-6. 10.1002/lt.21888 - DOI - PubMed