Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 30;139(18):2113-2125.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037401.

Long-Term Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages and Risk of Mortality in US Adults

Affiliations

Long-Term Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages and Risk of Mortality in US Adults

Vasanti S Malik et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

Background: Whether consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) or artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) is associated with risk of mortality is of public health interest.

Methods: We examined associations between consumption of SSBs and ASBs with risk of total and cause-specific mortality among 37 716 men from the Health Professional's Follow-up study (from 1986 to 2014) and 80 647 women from the Nurses' Health study (from 1980 to 2014) who were free from chronic diseases at baseline. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

Results: We documented 36 436 deaths (7896 cardiovascular disease [CVD] and 12 380 cancer deaths) during 3 415 564 person-years of follow-up. After adjusting for major diet and lifestyle factors, consumption of SSBs was associated with a higher risk of total mortality; pooled hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) across categories (<1/mo, 1-4/mo, 2-6/week, 1-<2/d, and ≥2/d) were 1.00 (reference), 1.01 (0.98, 1.04), 1.06 (1.03, 1.09), 1.14 (1.09, 1.19), and 1.21 (1.13, 1.28; P trend <0.0001). The association was observed for CVD mortality (hazard ratio comparing extreme categories was 1.31 [95% confidence interval, 1.15, 1.50], P trend <0.0001) and cancer mortality (1.16 [1.04, 1.29], P trend =0.0004). ASBs were associated with total and CVD mortality in the highest intake category only; pooled hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) across categories were 1.00 (reference), 0.96 (0.93, 0.99), 0.97 (0.95, 1.00), 0.98 (0.94, 1.03), and 1.04 (1.02, 1.12; P trend = 0.01) for total mortality and 1.00 (reference), 0.93 (0.87, 1.00), 0.95 (0.89, 1.00), 1.02 (0.94, 1.12), and 1.13 (1.02, 1.25; P trend = 0.02) for CVD mortality. In cohort-specific analysis, ASBs were associated with mortality in NHS (Nurses' Health Study) but not in HPFS (Health Professionals Follow-up Study) ( P interaction, 0.01). ASBs were not associated with cancer mortality in either cohort.

Conclusions: Consumption of SSBs was positively associated with mortality primarily through CVD mortality and showed a graded association with dose. The positive association between high intake levels of ASBs and total and CVD mortality observed among women requires further confirmation.

Keywords: all-cause death; artificially sweetened beverages; cardiovascular death; low calorie beverages; sugar-sweetened beverages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: WCW and VSM are on a pro bono retainer for expert support for the Center for Science in the Public Interest in litigation related to sugar sweetened beverages and have served as consultants for the City of San Francisco for a case related to health warning labels on soda. None of the other authors have financial or personal conflicts of interest to disclose that are related to the contents of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Total Mortality According to SSB Intake (Serving/Day) (A) and ASB (B) Stratified by Age, BMI, Physical Activity and Diet Quality based on pooled data from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) and Pooled Data from Both Cohorts. Adjusted for: age, ASB or SSB, smoking, alcohol intake, postmenopausal hormone use (NHS), physical activity, family history of diabetes, family history of mi, family history of cancer, multivitamin use, ethnicity, aspirin use, baseline history of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, intakes of whole grains, fruit, vegetables, red and processed meat, total energy and BMI. For SSB, all p-interaction >0.10. For ASB, p-interaction > 0.10 except for BMI (p-interaction, 0.01) and physical activity (p-interaction, 0.004) from the pooled analysis and BMI in the NHS (p-interaction, 0.002).
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Total Mortality According to SSB Intake (Serving/Day) (A) and ASB (B) Stratified by Age, BMI, Physical Activity and Diet Quality based on pooled data from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) and Pooled Data from Both Cohorts. Adjusted for: age, ASB or SSB, smoking, alcohol intake, postmenopausal hormone use (NHS), physical activity, family history of diabetes, family history of mi, family history of cancer, multivitamin use, ethnicity, aspirin use, baseline history of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, intakes of whole grains, fruit, vegetables, red and processed meat, total energy and BMI. For SSB, all p-interaction >0.10. For ASB, p-interaction > 0.10 except for BMI (p-interaction, 0.01) and physical activity (p-interaction, 0.004) from the pooled analysis and BMI in the NHS (p-interaction, 0.002).

Comment in

References

    1. Hu FB and Malik VS. Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes: epidemiologic evidence. Physiol behav. 2010;100:47–54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. NIH. National Cancer Institute: Division of Cancer control & Population Sceinces. Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program. Sources of Calories from Added Sugars among the US population, 2005–2006. Updated April 20, 2018. http://riskfactor.cancer.gov/diet/foodsources/added_sugars/. Accessed 10/02/13.
    1. Welsh JA, Sharma AJ, Grellinger L and Vos MB. Consumption of added sugars is decreasing in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:726–734. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ogden CL, Kit BK, Carroll MD and Park S. Consumption of sugar drinks in the United States, 2005–2008. NCHS data brief. 2011:1–8. - PubMed
    1. Rosinger A, Herrick K, Gahche J and Park S. Sugar-sweetened Beverage Consumption Among U.S. Adults, 2011–2014. NCHS data brief. 2017:1–8. - PubMed

Publication types