Clinical application of dual-phase F-18 sodium-fluoride bone PET/CT for diagnosing surgical site infection following orthopedic surgery
- PMID: 30882648
- PMCID: PMC6426471
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014770
Clinical application of dual-phase F-18 sodium-fluoride bone PET/CT for diagnosing surgical site infection following orthopedic surgery
Abstract
F-18 sodium-fluoride (NaF) bone positron emission tomography (PET/CT) has been used for diagnosing various bone and joint diseases, and, with using dual-phase scan protocol, it could give the same information obtained by the 3-phase bone scintigraphy. The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of dual-phase F-18 NaF bone PET/CT in detecting surgical site infection after orthopedic surgery.Twenty-three patients who underwent dual-phase F-18 NaF bone PET/CT under clinical suspicion of surgical site infection of the bone following orthopedic surgery were enrolled in this study. Dual-phase bone PET/CT consisted of an early phase scan performed immediately after radiotracer injection and a conventional bone-phase scan. All dual-phase PET/CT images were visually assessed, and, for quantitative analysis, 6 parameters of dual-phase PET/CT (lesion-to-blood pool uptake ratio, lesion-to-bone uptake ratio, and lesion-to-muscle uptake ratio on both early phase and bone-phase scans) were measured.Surgical site infection was diagnosed in 14 patients of the 23 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of visual analysis of dual-phase F-18 NaF bone PET/CT for diagnosing surgical site infection of the bone were 92.9%, 100.0%, and 95.7%, respectively. Among the 6 parameters, the lesion-to-blood pool uptake ratio on early phase scan showed the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value (0.857, 95% confidence interval, 0.649-0.966), with the cut-off value of 0.88 showing sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85.7%, 88.9%, and 87.0%, respectively.Our study showed the high diagnostic ability of dual-phase F-18 NaF bone PET/CT for detecting surgical site infection following orthopedic surgery. Further studies are needed to compare the diagnostic ability of dual-phase bone PET/CT with other imaging modalities.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, et al. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606–8. - PubMed
-
- Mistry JB, Naqvi A, Chughtai M, et al. Decreasing the incidence of surgical-site infections after total joint arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2017;46:E374–e387. - PubMed
-
- Urban JA. Cost analysis of surgical site infections. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2006;7suppl 1:S19–22. - PubMed
-
- Weigelt JA, Lipsky BA, Tabak YP, et al. Surgical site infections: causative pathogens and associated outcomes. Am J Infect Control 2010;38:112–20. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
