Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2019 Apr;41(2):111-114.
doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000627.

Improving Therapeutic Decisions: Pharmacodynamic Monitoring as an Integral Part of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Affiliations
Editorial

Improving Therapeutic Decisions: Pharmacodynamic Monitoring as an Integral Part of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Maria Shipkova et al. Ther Drug Monit. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Although the monitoring of drug therapies based on the determination of drug concentrations in biological materials is certainly an important instrument for individualized dosing and dose adjustment with a broad variety of pharmaceuticals, its role is limited by the fact that it does not reflect pharmacodynamic (PD) and toxicodynamic interactions such as those caused by individual and environment-related factors. However, these interactions are important for both the efficacy and the safety of the drug therapy. Therefore, during recent years, there is an increased interest in personalized drug therapy as reflected by the development and clinical implementation of molecular "biomarkers" that are direct or surrogate markers of pharmacological effects [PD therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)]. Moreover, this process is driven by new developments in instrumentation, such as mass spectrometry and array technologies, and in computational biology/pharmacology, databases, and bioinformatics. This Focus Issue of the journal focuses on current achievements in and status of PD TDM with different classes of drugs. The contributions to the present issue of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring provide a critical analysis of current practices of TDM with their limitations, introduce newer promising biomarkers in the field of PD TDM, discuss the challenges faced to date in translating preclinical tools into clinical settings, and point out recent advances in the establishment of modeling approaches that apply to pharmacokinetics (PK)/PD as well as pharmacogenetic information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Guidance of drug therapy by PK and PD monitoring

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pippenger CE. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is turning 30 – Happy Birthday. The IATDMCT Newsletter Compass, December 2009.
    1. Definitions of TDM&CT. International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology. Official website. https://www.iatdmct.org/about-us/about-association/about-definitions-tdm..., last update 2011, accessed December, 2018
    1. Brunet M, Shipkova M, van Gelder T et al. Barcelona consensus on biomarker-based immunosuppressive drugs management in solid organ transplantation. Ther Drug Monit. 2016;38 Suppl 1:S1–20. - PubMed
    1. Shipkova M Biomarker monitoring in immunosuppressant therapy: an overview In Oellerich Michael and Dasgupta Amitava eds., Personalized Immunosuppression in Transplantation: Role of Biomarker Monitoring and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. 1st ed, Elsevier;2015:125–152. ISBN-13:978-0128008850
    1. Aronson JK, Ferner RE. Biomarkers-A General Review. Curr Protoc Pharmacol. 2017;76:9.23.1–9.23.17. - PubMed

Publication types