Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 18;45(1):39.
doi: 10.1186/s13052-019-0632-z.

Medico-legal considerations on "Lotus Birth" in the Italian legislative framework

Alessandro Bonsignore  1 , Francesca Buffelli  2   3 , Rosagemma Ciliberti  4 , Francesco Ventura  4 , Andrea Molinelli  4 , Ezio Fulcheri  3   5
Affiliations

Medico-legal considerations on "Lotus Birth" in the Italian legislative framework

Alessandro Bonsignore et al. Ital J Pediatr. .

Abstract

The term "Lotus Birth" identifies the practice of not cutting the umbilical cord and of leaving the placenta attached to the newborn after its expulsion until it detaches spontaneously, which generally occurs 3-10 days after birth. The first reported cases of Lotus Birth date back to 2004 in Australia.Supporters of such a procedure claim that the newborn is better perfused, endowed with a more robust immune system and "less stressed".However, it should be pointed out that histopathological study of the placenta is increasingly being requested in order to investigate problems of an infective nature or dysmaturity affecting the foetus, and situations of risk affecting the mother. Moreover, from the legal standpoint, there is no uniform position on the question of whether the placenta belongs to the mother or to the newborn. Lastly, a proper conservation of the embryonic adnexa is very difficult and includes problems of a hygiene/health, infectivological and medico-legal nature.The authors analyzed all these aspect in the Italian legislative framework, reaching the conclusion that Lotus Birth is inadvisable from both the scientific and logical/rational points of view.

Keywords: Health safety; Italian legislative framework; Lotus birth; Medico-legal implications; Placenta.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Levy T, Blickstein I. Timing of cord clamping revisited. J Perinat Med. 2006;34:293–297. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2006.056. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zinsser LA. Lotus birth, a holistic approach on physiological cord clamping. Women Birth. 2018;31:e73–e76. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.08.127. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burns E. More than clinical waste? Placenta rituals among Australian home-birthing women. J Perinat Educ. 2014;23:41–49. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.23.1.41. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crowther S. Lotus birth: leaving the cord alone. Pract Midwife. 2006;9:12–14. - PubMed
    1. Kraus FT, Redline RW, Gersell DJ, Nelson DM, Dicke JM. Anatomy, structure, development, and function. In: AFIP, editor. Placental pathology. 2004. p. 1–22.