Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May:100:335-343.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

Pros and Cons of Clinically Relevant Methods to Assess Pain in Rodents

Anke Tappe-Theodor  1 , Tamara King  2 , Michael M Morgan  3
Affiliations
Review

Pros and Cons of Clinically Relevant Methods to Assess Pain in Rodents

Anke Tappe-Theodor et al. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 May.

Abstract

The primary objective of preclinical pain research is to improve the treatment of pain. Decades of research using pain-evoked tests has revealed much about mechanisms but failed to deliver new treatments. Evoked pain-tests are often limited because they ignore spontaneous pain and motor or disruptive side effects confound interpretation of results. New tests have been developed to focus more closely on clinical goals such as reducing pathological pain and restoring function. The objective of this review is to describe and discuss several of these tests. We focus on: Grimace Scale, Operant Behavior, Wheel Running, Burrowing, Nesting, Home Cage Monitoring, Gait Analysis and Conditioned Place Preference/ Aversion. A brief description of each method is presented along with an analysis of the advantages and limitations. The pros and cons of each test will help researchers identify the assessment tool most appropriate to meet their particular objective to assess pain in rodents. These tests provide another tool to unravel the mechanisms underlying chronic pain and help overcome the translational gap in drug development.

Keywords: Burrowing; CPA; CPP; Gait analysis; Grimace scale; Home cage monitoring; Nesting; Nociception; Operant behavior; Pain Assessment; Preclinical validity; Translational research; Wheel running.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adams BL,Guo W, Gors RT, Knopp KL (2016). Pharmacological interrogation of a rodent forced ambulation model: leveraging gait impairment as a measure of pain behavior pre-clinically. Osteoarthr Cartil 24, 1928–1939. - PubMed
    1. Andrews N, Harper S, Issop Y, Rice ASC (2011). Novel, nonreflex tests detect analgesic action in rodents at clinically relevant concentrations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1245, 11–13. - PubMed
    1. Arbour C, Gélinas C (2014). Behavioral and Physiologic Indicators of Pain in Nonverbal Patients with a Traumatic Brain Injury:An Integrative Review. Pain Manag Nurs 15(2):506–18. - PubMed
    1. Arras M (2007). Improvement of pain therapy in laboratory mice. ALTEX 24 Spec No, 6–8. - PubMed
    1. Aubert A (1999). Sickness and behaviour in animals: A motivational perspective. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 23, 1029–1036. - PubMed

Publication types