Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2019 Mar 12:12:1178632919834315.
doi: 10.1177/1178632919834315. eCollection 2019.

Building Better Clinical Relationships With Patients: An Argument for Digital Health Solutions With Black Men

Affiliations
Comment

Building Better Clinical Relationships With Patients: An Argument for Digital Health Solutions With Black Men

Ledric D Sherman et al. Health Serv Insights. .

Abstract

There is a rapid evolution of care delivery taking place across the globe in response to an explosion of novel health technologies. Growing in parallel to this expansion is the anticipation of mHealth technologies to drive patient-centered care into the future. Despite this hope, continuing reports of health inequities and lived experiences of substandard care fill national, state, and community health reports. The impact of these inequities is particularly pernicious on Black men and their long-term health status. As decades of robust evidence substantiates needed interventions, current progress is not seeing expected gains. In this commentary, we argue that at the heart of these inequities are issues of access, health literacy, institutional racism, and growing social distance between clinicians and Black men. To address these inequities, we suggest that digital interventions, designed to support decision-making, information exchange, and shared accountability have the best hope to overcome current inequities by promoting authentic relationships that ultimately drive better communication between Black men and their clinicians.

Keywords: Black men; digital health; health care delivery; health inequities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Comment on

References

    1. Benjamin GC. Health equity and social justice: a health improvement tool. Grant Makers in Health. http://www.gih.org/files/FileDownloads/Health_Equity_Social_Justice_APHA.... Up-dated May 19, 2015. Accessed January 8, 2019.
    1. Gilbert KL, Ray R, Siddiqi A, et al. Visible and invisible trends in Black men’s health: pitfalls and promises for addressing racial, ethnic, and gender inequities in health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:295–311. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021556. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saha S, Komaromy M, Koepsell TD, Bindman AB. Patient-physician racial concordance and the perceived quality and use of health care. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:997–1004. doi:10.1001/archinte.159.9.997. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malat J. Social distance and patients’ rating of healthcare providers. J Health Soc Behav. 2001;42:360–372. - PubMed
    1. Alsan M, Garrick O, Graziani GC. Does Diversity Matter for Health? Experimental Evidence from Oakland. New York, NY: NBER.