The discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of d-amphetamine, phenmetrazine and fenfluramine in humans
- PMID: 3088654
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00174364
The discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of d-amphetamine, phenmetrazine and fenfluramine in humans
Abstract
The discriminative stimulus (DS) and subjective effects of d-amphetamine (AMP), phenmetrazine (PMT) and fenfluramine (FFL) were studied in a group of normal healthy adults. Subjects (N = 27) were trained to discriminate between placebo and 10 mg AMP (PO). Fourteen of the subjects (discriminators) reliably learned the discrimination, whereas the other 13 did not. Nearly all discriminators labelled AMP as a stimulant, and AMP, relative to placebo, increased ratings of drug liking and general activity level, and produced typical stimulant-like subjective effects, as measured by the Profile of Mood States, the Addiction Research Center Inventory, and a series of visual analog scales. The discrimination accuracy of discriminators increased as a function of hour after drug ingestion, as did analog ratings of how certain subjects were that their discrimination responses were correct. Discriminators were tested with doses of PMT (25 and 50 mg) and FFL (20 and 40 mg) to determine whether the DS properties of these drugs would substitute for those of AMP. Both doses of PMT consistently substituted for AMP, and PMT produced subjective effects very similar to those of AMP. Conversely, neither dose of FFL consistently substituted for AMP, and FFL produced essentially no subjective effects. These findings are consistent with results from discrimination studies with other species, and provide further evidence of the validity of this procedure for studying the DS properties of drugs in humans.
Similar articles
-
Discriminative stimulus effects of caffeine and benzphetamine in amphetamine-trained volunteers.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988;96(3):302-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00216054. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988. PMID: 3146764
-
The discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of phenylpropanolamine, mazindol and d-amphetamine in humans.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1986 Jun;24(6):1665-72. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(86)90503-4. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1986. PMID: 3737634 Clinical Trial.
-
The discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1985;86(3):307-12. doi: 10.1007/BF00432219. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1985. PMID: 3929301 Clinical Trial.
-
Reinforcing and subjective effects of several anorectics in normal human volunteers.J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987 Sep;242(3):777-83. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987. PMID: 3656112 Clinical Trial.
-
[Discriminative stimulus properties of D-amphetamine: a neuropharmacological review].Yakubutsu Seishin Kodo. 1992 Aug;12(4):151-65. Yakubutsu Seishin Kodo. 1992. PMID: 1414035 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Discriminative stimulus effects of d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and diazepam in humans.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1991;103(4):436-42. doi: 10.1007/BF02244241. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1991. PMID: 2062984 Clinical Trial.
-
Discriminative stimulus effects of caffeine and benzphetamine in amphetamine-trained volunteers.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988;96(3):302-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00216054. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988. PMID: 3146764
-
Discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of smoked marijuana in humans.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988;94(2):206-12. doi: 10.1007/BF00176846. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988. PMID: 3127846 Clinical Trial.
-
Drug discrimination by humans compared to nonhumans: current status and future directions.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1993;111(3):259-70. doi: 10.1007/BF02244940. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1993. PMID: 7870962 Review.
-
Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1984-1987.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989;98(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00442000. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989. PMID: 2498952 No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources