Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr;26(2):434-451.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01582-0.

Explaining the SPoARC and SNARC effects with knowledge structures: An expertise account

Affiliations
Review

Explaining the SPoARC and SNARC effects with knowledge structures: An expertise account

Alessandro Guida et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Two proposals have been put forward to account conjointly for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect and the spatial-positional association of response codes (SPoARC) effect: the working memory account and the dual account. Here, on the basis of experimental and theoretical knowledge acquired in the field of expert memory, we propose an alternative account-named the expertise account-that explains both effects through the acquisition and use of knowledge structures (a generalization of "chunks," "retrieval structures," and "templates"), which have been used extensively in expert memory theory. These knowledge structures can be of two types: nonslotted or slotted schemas. We suggest that the SNARC effect can be explained via the use of nonslotted schemas, and the SPoARC effect via slotted schemas. We conclude our article by presenting the broader implications of our framework for working memory in general, when considering knowledge structures.

Keywords: Expertise; Mathematical cognition; Ordinal position effect; Retrieval structures; SNARC; SPoARC; Spatial cognition; Templates; Verbal working memory; Working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Behav Brain Sci. 1997 Mar;20(1):1-19; discussion 19-55 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Rev. 2000 Jan;107(1):127-81 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 May;26(3):671-82 - PubMed
    1. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Nov 1;4(11):417-423 - PubMed
    1. Br J Psychol. 2000 Nov;91 ( Pt 4):551-70 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources