Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;30(3):e29.
doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e29.

PCR-reverse dot blot human papillomavirus genotyping as a primary screening test for cervical cancer in a hospital-based cohort

Affiliations

PCR-reverse dot blot human papillomavirus genotyping as a primary screening test for cervical cancer in a hospital-based cohort

Yafang Kang et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 May.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-reverse-dot-blot (RDB) human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping test as a feasible assay for the cervical cancer primary screening.

Methods: In a hospital-based cohort, a total of 21,568 women were voluntarily enrolled from March 2009 to November 2016 for evaluating the 3 current cervical cancer screening strategies: co-test, cytology primary and high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) primary by using PCR-RDB HPV genotyping and liquid-based cytology (thinprep cytologic test [TCT]). Women with HR-HPV infection and/or abnormal cytology were referred for colposcopy, and the biopsy or conization was performed according to the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) guidelines.

Results: Overall, 18.20% (3,935/21,568) of the women were detected as HR-HPV-positive, 5.04% (1,088/21,568) were diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or higher (CIN2+), and 3.43% (739/21,568) with CIN3+. The cumulative incidence rates for CIN2+/CIN3+ in patients with HPV-16/18-positive were 48.28%/37.20%, while they were 0.86%/0.38%, 0.30%/0.15% and 0.18%/0.09% in cytology-negative, HR-HPV-negative and co-test-negative population, respectively. Using CIN2+ and CIN3+ as the observed endpoints, the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of HR-HPV genotyping as a primary screening tool were 90.99%/99.49% and 91.57%/99.80%. Moreover, using HR-HPV genotyping primary screening could detect the same more CIN2+/CIN3+ cases in baseline-detection as co-testing (990/700 vs. 991/701) and far more than cytology primary screening (903/656, p<0.05). It also achieved the lowest misdiagnosis rate (8.01%/5.02%). Although HPV genotyping primary screening required an increased number of colposcopies (2.75/3.89 per CIN2+/CIN3+ case), it yielded an acceptable rate.

Conclusions: The PCR-RDB HPV genotyping test is a cost-effective and beneficial cervical cancer primary screening for hospital-based opportunistic screening.

Keywords: Cancer Screening; Cervical Cancer; Cytology; Genotype; Papillomaviridae.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Flowchart of inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study population.
ASC-US, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; HPV, human papillomavirus; HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; LSIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy; PCR-RDB, polymerase chain reaction-reverse dot blot; TCT, thinprep cytologic test. *HR-HPV (+): including HPV-16/-18 (+) (n=1,336) and HR-HPV non-16/18 (+) (n=2,599).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Three cervical screening strategies to detect CIN2+/CIN3+. Effectiveness analysis of cervical screening strategies: primary screening algorithms. (A) Strategy I was co-testing, cytology combined with HPV using as the primary detection. (B) Strategy II was primary cytological detection with triaged by HPV testing. (C) Strategy III was primary HR-HPV testing with HPV-16/-18 genotype. In different strategies, the cases with ≥CIN2+ detected in the baseline screening, first year recall and the subsequent follow-up were listed in Fig. 2.
ASC-US, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; HPV, human papillomavirus; HR-HPV, high-risk human papillomavirus; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. The examinations consumed by the three cervical screening strategies to detect CIN2+/CIN3+. (A) The cases of CIN2+ detected by three current cervical screening strategies were determined in baseline screening, first year re-call, and subsequent follow-up. (B) The cases of CIN3+ detected by three current cervical screening strategies were calculated in baseline screening, first year re-call, and subsequent follow-up. (C) For baseline screening, according to the different cervical screening strategies, the number of cytologic assays, HPV assays, and colposcopies that should be performed as well as analysis of CIN2+ cases that could be detected. (D) The three cervical screening strategies used for CIN3+ detection, with application of cytology assay, HPV assay, and colposcopy shown.
CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; HPV, human papillomavirus; TCT, thinprep cytologic test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2012: cancer fact sheet. Cervical cancer estimated incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012 [Internet] Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. [cited 2013 Dec 12]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/old/FactSheets/cancers/cervix-new.asp.
    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. - PubMed
    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:115–132. - PubMed
    1. Crosbie EJ, Einstein MH, Franceschi S, Kitchener HC. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 2013;382:889–899. - PubMed
    1. Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Muñoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2002;55:244–265. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms