Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Aug;29(6):123-131.
doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000375.

An initial genetic analysis of gemcitabine-induced high-grade neutropenia in pancreatic cancer patients in CALGB 80303 (Alliance)

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

An initial genetic analysis of gemcitabine-induced high-grade neutropenia in pancreatic cancer patients in CALGB 80303 (Alliance)

Federico Innocenti et al. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: One of the standard of care regimens for advanced pancreatic cancer is gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. The efficacy of gemcitabine is limited by dose-limiting hematologic toxicities especially neutropenia. Uncovering the variability of these toxicities attributed to germline DNA variation is of great importance.

Patients and methods: CALGB 80303 was a randomized study in advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine with or without bevacizumab. The study protocol included genotyping of genes of gemcitabine disposition (CDA, DCTD, SLC29A1, SLC28A1, and SLC29A2), as well as a genome-wide analysis. The clinical phenotype was time to early high-grade neutropenia event accounting for progression or death or other treatment-terminating adverse events as competing for informative events. The inference was carried out on the basis of the association between genotype and cause-specific hazard of a neutropenic event.

Results: The primary analyses were carried out on the basis of 294 genetically estimated European pancreatic cancer patients. For CDA rs2072671 (A>C), AC and CC patients had a lower risk of neutropenia than AA patients (P=0.01, hazard ratio: 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.89). For SLC28A1 rs3825876 (G>A), AA patients have a higher risk of neutropenia than GA and GG patients (P=0.02, hazard ratio: 1.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-2.16). CDA rs2072671 was associated with increased mRNA expression in whole blood in three studies (P=2.7e-14, 6.61e-62, and 9.70e-65). In the genome-wide analysis, variants in TGFB2 were among the top hits (lowest P=1.62e-06) but had no effect in luciferase assays.

Conclusion: This is the first genetic analysis of gemcitabine-induced neutropenia using a competing risk model in a prospective randomized clinical study has proposed a potentially novel mechanism of the protective effect of the CDA rs2072671 variant. Further confirmation is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. CONSORT chart.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Cumulative incidence of high-grade neutropenia and competing events.
The graph on the right shows the stratification by arm (gemcitabine plus placebo and gemcitabine plus bevacizumab). The vertical line represents the cut-off for the definition of early neutropenia (5 weeks).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Effect of genotypes of CDA and SLC28A1 variants associated with early high-grade neutropenia.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Enhancer luciferase assays of TGFB2 variants.
A) PANC-1. B) K-562. Results are reported as the mean of 3 individual clones with n=3 experiments, with the exception of rs2799090 which had n=4 experiments in K-562 cells. The enhancer activity of each SNP was measured in both the forward and reverse orientation. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kindler HL, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Sutherland S, Schrag D, Hurwitz H, et al. Gemcitabine plus bevacizumab compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: phase III trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 80303). J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(22):3617–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47. - PubMed
    1. Innocenti F, Owzar K, Cox NL, Evans P, Kubo M, Zembutsu H, et al. A genome-wide association study of overall survival in pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine in CALGB 80303. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(2):577–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM (2000). Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. New York: Springer.
    1. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2018. Vienna, Austria: [cited 2018]. Available from: www.R-project.org.

Publication types