Evaluation of the success rate and complications of conventional varicocelectomy: Do we need microscopic surgery really?
- PMID: 30890103
- DOI: 10.1177/0391560318758938
Evaluation of the success rate and complications of conventional varicocelectomy: Do we need microscopic surgery really?
Abstract
Objective:: Varicocele is the most commonly curable cause of infertility in men. Varicocele is found in 15% of the total male population, 35% of men with primary infertility, and 75%-81% of men with secondary infertility. Generally, patients seek microscopic surgery via surfing the Internet, which is not an available option in all medical centers. The purpose of this study was to determine the success rate and complications of conventional varicocelectomy and to compare it with that of the microscopic method.
Methods:: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 88 patients with varicocele who underwent non-microscopic varicocele surgery in the 15th Khordad Hospital during 2013-2015 were evaluated by the census method.
Results:: The mean age of patients with varicocele was 27.30 years; 52 patients underwent bilateral varicocelectomy and 36 left varicocelectomy. Surgical complications of non-microscopic varicocelectomy in the studied patients included bleeding and hydrocele formation both in 0.7% and recurrence in 2.8%. Testicular atrophy was not observed in any case.
Conclusion:: The incidence of recurrence, hydrocele formation, atrophy, and bleeding in non-microscopic varicocelectomy, if done in accordance with its principles, is not more than the microscopic approach and therefore it could be recommended as a safe surgical treatment in centers where microscopic surgery is not available.
Keywords: Varicocele; infertility; non-microscopic surgery.
Similar articles
-
Varicocelectomy in adolescent boys: long-term experience with the Palomo procedure.J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4 Suppl):1657-9; discussion 1659-60. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.099. Epub 2008 Aug 16. J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18708215
-
Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial.Urology. 2007 Mar;69(3):417-20. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.057. Urology. 2007. PMID: 17382134 Clinical Trial.
-
Retroperitoneal high ligation versus subinguinal varicocelectomy: Effectiveness of two different varicocelectomy techniques on the treatment of painful varicocele.Andrologia. 2019 Aug;51(7):e13293. doi: 10.1111/and.13293. Epub 2019 Apr 17. Andrologia. 2019. PMID: 30995701
-
Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique.J Androl. 2009 Jan-Feb;30(1):33-40. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.108.005967. Epub 2008 Sep 4. J Androl. 2009. PMID: 18772487 Review.
-
[Microsurgical varicocelectomy for male infertility].Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2008 Jul;14(7):640-4. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2008. PMID: 18686388 Review. Chinese.
Cited by
-
Improvement of sperm morphology after surgical varicocele repair.Andrology. 2021 Jul;9(4):1176-1184. doi: 10.1111/andr.13012. Epub 2021 May 6. Andrology. 2021. PMID: 33825345 Free PMC article.
-
Role of hydrogen sulfide in the male reproductive system.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 May 30;15:1377090. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1377090. eCollection 2024. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38883604 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Influence of Varicocelectomy on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes of Infertile Patients with Varicocele: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Am J Mens Health. 2025 Mar-Apr;19(2):15579883251334561. doi: 10.1177/15579883251334561. Epub 2025 Apr 28. Am J Mens Health. 2025. PMID: 40293106 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical