Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Oct;104(10):2028-2039.
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.201053. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of minimal residual disease as a prognostic indicator in adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of minimal residual disease as a prognostic indicator in adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Renato Bassan et al. Haematologica. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Minimal (or 'measurable') residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia appears to be a prognostic indicator, with potential value in informing individualized treatment decisions. Complete understanding of the strength of the association between minimal residual disease and long-term outcomes is, however, lacking. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed to elucidate the clinical significance of minimal residual disease with respect to relapse-free survival and overall survival in precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A total of 23 articles and abstracts, most published between 2012 and 2016, were identified for inclusion in the primary meta-analysis. Typically, patients were in their first complete remission at the time of minimal residual disease assessment; in two studies, all patients were in their second, or later, complete remission. The primary analysis revealed improved relapse-free survival across all studies for patients who achieved minimal residual disease negativity (random effects hazard ratio, 2.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.91-2.86). Improved overall survival for patients who achieved minimal residual disease negativity was also observed (hazard ratio, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-2.94). There was no observed difference in the impact of minimal residual disease status in subgroups based on disease stage, minimal residual disease sensitivity threshold level, Philadelphia chromosome status, histological phenotype, risk group, minimal residual disease testing location, minimal residual disease timing after induction, or minimal residual disease detection method. Despite heterogeneity in study design and patient populations between the contributing studies, these data provide a compelling argument for minimal residual disease as a clinical tool for assessing prognosis and guiding treatment decisions in precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram. aIncludes four full text articles that were not identified during the systematic literature searches. bProtocol amendment. Includes disease-free survival, leukemia-free survival and duration of complete response or progression-free survival. ALL: acute lymphoblastic leukemia; B cell ALL/B-ALL: B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; HR: hazard ratio; MRD: minimal residual disease; MRD+: minimal residual disease-negative status; MRD+: minimal residual disease-positive status; PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; RFS: relapse-free survival; T cell ALL/T-ALL: T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Forest plot of relapse-free survival hazard ratios for all studies included in the primary analysis. CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; MRD: minimal residual disease; MRD neg: minimal residual disease-negative status; MRD pos: minimal residual disease-positive status.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Forest plot of relapse-free survival hazard ratios by subgroup (random effects model). B cell ALL/B-ALL: B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CI: confidence interval; CR1: first complete remission; CR2: second complete remission; Chemo: chemotherapy; Flow: flow cytometry; HR: hazard ratio; HSCT: hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation; MRD: minimal residual disease; MRD neg: minimal residual disease-negative status; MRD pos: minimal residual disease-positive status; N: number of studies; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; Ph: Philadelphia chromosome; SCT: stem-cell transplantation; targeted: targeted agent (e.g., tyrosine kinase inhibitor, blinatumomab, inotuzumab); tx: treatment.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Forest plot of overall survival hazard ratios for all studies included in the primary analysis. CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; MRD: minimal residual disease; MRD neg: minimal residual disease-negative status; MRD pos: minimal residual disease-positive status.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Forest plot of overall survival hazard ratios by subgroup (random effects model). B cell ALL/B-ALL: B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CI: confidence interval; CR1: first complete remission; CR2: second complete remission; chemo: chemotherapy; Flow: flow cytometry; HR: hazard ratio; HSCT: hematopoietic stemcell transplantation; MRD: minimal residual disease; MRD neg: minimal residual disease-negative status; MRD pos: minimal residual disease-positive status; N: number of studies; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; Ph: Philadelphia chromosome; SCT: stem-cell transplantation; targeted: targeted agent (e.g., tyrosine kinase inhibitor, blinatumomab, inotuzumab); tx: treatment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carroll W, Loh M, Biondi A, Willman C. The biology of acute lymphoblastic leukemia In: Reaman G, Smith F, eds. Childhood Leukemia: a Practical Handbook. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2011:29–61.
    1. Cancer Research UK. Types of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. 2015. Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/acute-lymphoblastic-leukaem... (Accessed 24 May 2016).
    1. Fielding AK. Current treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2011;2011(1): 231–237. - PubMed
    1. Faderl S, Kantarjian HM, Talpaz M, Estrov Z. Clinical significance of cytogenetic abnormalities in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 1998;91(11):3995–4019. - PubMed
    1. Iacobucci I, Mullighan CG. Genetic basis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(9):975–983. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms