Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019;10(1):15-29.
Epub 2019 Feb 1.

Significance of the Pathologic Findings in Implantation Biopsies for Kidney Allografts Survival

Affiliations

Significance of the Pathologic Findings in Implantation Biopsies for Kidney Allografts Survival

A V Trailin et al. Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2019.

Abstract

Background: There is no consistent association between individual histological lesions and composite scores in donor kidney biopsy and transplant outcomes.

Objective: To evaluate which acute or chronic individual histological lesions and composite scores in donor kidney were associated with graft survival in the recipient.

Methods: We investigated the association of individual histological lesions and 8 composite scoring systems in implantation biopsies of cadaveric (n=101) and living (n=29) kidneys with 5-year death-censored graft survival.

Results: We found a high frequency of chronic lesions in donor kidneys, mostly associated with arteriosclerosis, and less dependent from donor age. Acute, chronic, and total Banff scores for post-transplant biopsies, chronic and total Banff scores for pre-implant biopsies, donor damage score and chronic damage score predicted death-censored graft loss. However, only chronic and total Banff-scores had significant effects in multivariate model. Chronic pre-implant and total post-transplant Banff scores demonstrated the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.722 and 0.717, respectively. Among individual lesions, glomerulosclerosis ≥20%, interstitial inflammation >0, arteriosclerosis =3, arteriolar hyalinosis >0, and interstitial fibrosis >0, assessed with Banff-grading criteria, were associated with lower allograft survival. We created the Donor Kidney Damage Index (DKDI), by summing regression coefficients for these lesions, which yielded the AUC of 0.747. When combined with retransplantation, cold ischemia time and acute rejection, DKDI, chronic pre-implant and total post-transplant Banff scores further improved their predictive accuracy, yielding AUCs of 0.842, 0.807, and 0.802, respectively.

Conclusion: DKDI, chronic pre-implant and total post-transplant Banff scores alone and combined with clinical variables may facilitate decision making in post-transplant period.

Keywords: Implantation biopsy histology; Individual and composite histological scores; Kidney allograft survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histopathological findings in implantation kidney biopsies. A) Focal acute tubular necrosis, H&E staining (original magnification ×400); B) Glomerular thrombi, H&E (original magnification ×400); C) Arteriolar hyalinosis, PAS staining (original magnification ×400); D) Arteriosclerosis, focal interstitial fibrosis, and acute tubular injury, PAS staining (original magnification ×200).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association of death-censored kidney graft survival and selected composite histological scores in intra-operative zero-hour biopsies (Kaplan-Meier estimates). A) Chronic pre-implant Banff score; B) Chronic post-transplant Banff score; C) Donor damage score; D) Chronic damage score; E) Acute post-transplant Banff score; and F) Donor Kidney Damage Index. P values are calculated with the log-rank test
Figure 3
Figure 3
Association of death-censored kidney graft survival and selected individual histological lesions in intra-operative zero-hour biopsies (Kaplan-Meier estimates). A) Glomerulosclerosis; B) Arteriolar hyalinosis; C) Arteriosclerosis; D) Interstitial fibrosis; and E) Interstitial inflammation. P values are calculated with the log-rank test

References

    1. Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott KC, et al. US renal data system 2016 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;69(Suppl 1):S1–S688. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balaz P, Rokosny S, Wohlfahrtova M, et al. Identification of expanded-criteria donor kidney grafts at lower risk of delayed graft function. Transplantation. 2013;96:633–8. - PubMed
    1. Kayler LK, Mohanka R, Basu A, et al. Correlation of histologic findings on preimplant biopsy with kidney graft survival. Transpl Int. 2008;21:892–8. - PubMed
    1. Schold JD, Kaplan B, Baliga RS, Meier-Kriesche HU. The broad spectrum of quality in deceased donor kidneys. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:757–65. - PubMed
    1. Carta P, Zanazzi M, Caroti L, et al. Impact of the pre-transplant histological score on 3-year graft outcomes of kidneys from marginal donors: a single-centre study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28:2637–44. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources