Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986 May;29(5):765-8.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.29.5.765.

Artifacts in dilution pharmacokinetic models caused by adherent bacteria

Artifacts in dilution pharmacokinetic models caused by adherent bacteria

R Haag et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 May.

Abstract

Liquid cultures of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain in Mueller-Hinton broth diluted at rates higher than the bacterial growth rate showed the expected decrease in CFU only for 1 to 2 h. Later the CFU started to increase. This phenomenon can be explained by a hypothesis that assumes that the bacteria multiply in two different compartments. From the first compartment, which comprises bacteria homogeneously distributed in the broth, cells are eliminated at a rate that is dependent on the dilution and growth rates. Concomitantly, the second compartment is formed as a nondilutable adherent population on the surface of the culture vessel. Eventually, only cells stemming from that population appeared in the medium and were subsequently diluted. This hypothesis can be described mathematically by a linear combination of two exponential functions. The calculated values fit the experimental data well. Because similar CFU versus time curves were also found with other strains, care should be taken in interpreting results of experiments performed in liquid cultures and evaluated in terms of CFU. One should bear in mind that within a liquid culture an adherent population may exist, which differs in size according to selective influences (dilution, addition of antibiotics, etc.). This may give rise to artificial and unexpected results.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Pharm Sci. 1969 Nov;58(11):1375-8 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Apr;13(4):570-6 - PubMed
    1. Rev Infect Dis. 1984 Sep-Oct;6(5):608-18 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1981 Sep;144(3):263-9 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Sep;18(3):377-81 - PubMed