Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 20;21(3):e12802.
doi: 10.2196/12802.

Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Primary Care: Exploratory Qualitative Study of UK General Practitioners' Views

Affiliations

Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Primary Care: Exploratory Qualitative Study of UK General Practitioners' Views

Charlotte Blease et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The potential for machine learning to disrupt the medical profession is the subject of ongoing debate within biomedical informatics and related fields.

Objective: This study aimed to explore general practitioners' (GPs') opinions about the potential impact of future technology on key tasks in primary care.

Methods: In June 2018, we conducted a Web-based survey of 720 UK GPs' opinions about the likelihood of future technology to fully replace GPs in performing 6 key primary care tasks, and, if respondents considered replacement for a particular task likely, to estimate how soon the technological capacity might emerge. This study involved qualitative descriptive analysis of written responses ("comments") to an open-ended question in the survey.

Results: Comments were classified into 3 major categories in relation to primary care: (1) limitations of future technology, (2) potential benefits of future technology, and (3) social and ethical concerns. Perceived limitations included the beliefs that communication and empathy are exclusively human competencies; many GPs also considered clinical reasoning and the ability to provide value-based care as necessitating physicians' judgments. Perceived benefits of technology included expectations about improved efficiencies, in particular with respect to the reduction of administrative burdens on physicians. Social and ethical concerns encompassed multiple, divergent themes including the need to train more doctors to overcome workforce shortfalls and misgivings about the acceptability of future technology to patients. However, some GPs believed that the failure to adopt technological innovations could incur harms to both patients and physicians.

Conclusions: This study presents timely information on physicians' views about the scope of artificial intelligence (AI) in primary care. Overwhelmingly, GPs considered the potential of AI to be limited. These views differ from the predictions of biomedical informaticians. More extensive, stand-alone qualitative work would provide a more in-depth understanding of GPs' views.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; attitudes; future; general practice; machine learning; opinions; primary care; qualitative research; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Comment in

References

    1. Wachter R. The Digital Doctor: Hope, Hype and at the Dawn of Medicines Computer Age. Pennsylvania: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015.
    1. Susskind RE, Susskind D. The Future Of Professions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.
    1. Coiera E. The fate of medicine in the time of AI. The Lancet. 2018 Dec;392(10162):2331–2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31925-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shah ND, Steyerberg EW, Kent DM. Big data and predictive analytics. J Am Med Assoc. 2018 Jul 03;320(1):27. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5602. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kohane I, Drazen Jm, Campion Ew. A Glimpse of the Next 100 Years in Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 27;367(26):2538–2539. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1213371. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types