Massage for Pain: An Evidence Map
- PMID: 30892910
- PMCID: PMC6533778
- DOI: 10.1089/acm.2018.0282
Massage for Pain: An Evidence Map
Abstract
Objectives: Massage therapy has been proposed for painful conditions, but it can be difficult to understand the breadth and depth of evidence, as various painful conditions may respond differently to massage. The authors conducted an evidence mapping process and generated an "evidence map" to visually depict the distribution of evidence available for massage and various pain indications to identify gaps in evidence and to inform future research priorities. Design: The authors searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for systematic reviews reporting pain outcomes for massage therapy. The authors assessed the quality of each review using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) criteria. The authors used a bubble plot to depict the number of included articles, pain indication, effect of massage for pain, and strength of findings for each included systematic review. Results: The authors identified 49 systematic reviews, of which 32 were considered high quality. Types of pain frequently included in systematic reviews were cancer pain, low back pain, and neck pain. High quality reviews concluded that there was low strength of evidence of potential benefits of massage for labor, shoulder, neck, low back, cancer, arthritis, postoperative, delayed onset muscle soreness, and musculoskeletal pain. Reported attributes of massage interventions include style of massage, provider, co-interventions, duration, and comparators, with 14 high-quality reviews reporting all these attributes in their review. Conclusion: Prior reviews have conclusions of low strength of evidence because few primary studies of large samples with rigorous methods had been conducted, leaving evidence gaps about specific massage type for specific pain. Primary studies often do not provide adequate details of massage therapy provided, limiting the extent to which reviews are able to draw conclusions about characteristics such as provider type.
Keywords: evidence map; massage; pain.
Conflict of interest statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Figures


References
-
- Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Mil Med 2016;181:397–399 - PubMed
-
- National Center for Health Statistics. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2013 State and National Summary Tables. Hyattsville, MD: Public Health Service, 2016.
-
- Turk DC, Wilson HD, Cahana A. Treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. Lancet 2011;377:2226–2235 - PubMed
-
- Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Deyo RA, Shekelle PG. A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy, and spinal manipulation for back pain. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:898–906 - PubMed
Appendix References
-
- Bardia A, Barton DL, Prokop LJ, et al. . Efficacy of complementary and alternative medicine therapies in relieving cancer pain: A systematic review. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:5457–5464 - PubMed
-
- Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, et al. . AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Reviews: Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (U.S.), 2016 - PubMed