Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;45(5):668-688.
doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001878.

A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Cosmetic Indications of Botulinum Toxin Treatment

Affiliations

A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Cosmetic Indications of Botulinum Toxin Treatment

Jenny Wang et al. Dermatol Surg. 2019 May.

Abstract

Background: Botulinum toxin (BTX) injection is the most popular cosmetic procedure in the United States. Although facial rejuvenation is considered cosmetic, physical appearance has meaningful impact on quality of life (QOL), best measured by patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Patient-reported outcomes are now often required for Food and Drug Administration approval of new pharmaceuticals.

Objective: This review summarizes the PRO instruments and outcomes in evaluating patient QOL after aesthetic BTX administration.

Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Plus, and PsycINFO databases were searched for prospective studies using PRO instruments to directly evaluate the success of cosmetic BTX intervention.

Results: Five psychometrically validated, facial rhytid-specific PRO tools are currently used in clinical research. Most studies addressing PROs after cosmetic BTX treatment use 1-item Likert scales evaluating overall satisfaction. BTX treatment generally resulted in improved satisfaction and QOL metrics, such as perception of youthfulness, attractiveness, restedness, affect, mood, and self-confidence. Combination treatments, whether of multiple facial areas or with multiple treatment modalities, may improve PROs even further.

Conclusion: Validated, specific PRO instruments can be used to better understand patient expectations in regards to cosmetic treatment, thus helping aesthetic dermatologists maximize patient satisfaction and retention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Substances