A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Cosmetic Indications of Botulinum Toxin Treatment
- PMID: 30893170
- DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001878
A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Cosmetic Indications of Botulinum Toxin Treatment
Abstract
Background: Botulinum toxin (BTX) injection is the most popular cosmetic procedure in the United States. Although facial rejuvenation is considered cosmetic, physical appearance has meaningful impact on quality of life (QOL), best measured by patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Patient-reported outcomes are now often required for Food and Drug Administration approval of new pharmaceuticals.
Objective: This review summarizes the PRO instruments and outcomes in evaluating patient QOL after aesthetic BTX administration.
Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Plus, and PsycINFO databases were searched for prospective studies using PRO instruments to directly evaluate the success of cosmetic BTX intervention.
Results: Five psychometrically validated, facial rhytid-specific PRO tools are currently used in clinical research. Most studies addressing PROs after cosmetic BTX treatment use 1-item Likert scales evaluating overall satisfaction. BTX treatment generally resulted in improved satisfaction and QOL metrics, such as perception of youthfulness, attractiveness, restedness, affect, mood, and self-confidence. Combination treatments, whether of multiple facial areas or with multiple treatment modalities, may improve PROs even further.
Conclusion: Validated, specific PRO instruments can be used to better understand patient expectations in regards to cosmetic treatment, thus helping aesthetic dermatologists maximize patient satisfaction and retention.
Comment in
-
Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes on Quality of Life After Aesthetic Botulinum Injections.Dermatol Surg. 2019 Dec;45(12):1745-1746. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001991. Dermatol Surg. 2019. PMID: 31403548 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Botulinum toxin for glabellar lines: a review of the efficacy and safety of currently available products.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2011 Dec 1;12(6):377-88. doi: 10.2165/11592100-000000000-00000. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2011. PMID: 21877763 Review.
-
A comprehensive review of patient-reported satisfaction with botulinum toxin type a for aesthetic procedures.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Dec;122(6):1915-1925. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818dbfe3. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008. PMID: 19050545 Review.
-
Aesthetic Treatment With Botulinum Toxin: Approaches Specific to Men.Dermatol Surg. 2017 Nov;43 Suppl 2:S153-S156. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001375. Dermatol Surg. 2017. PMID: 29064978 Review.
-
Botulinum toxin in facial rejuvenation: an update.Dermatol Clin. 2009 Oct;27(4):417-25, v. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2009.08.001. Dermatol Clin. 2009. PMID: 19850191 Review.
-
Italian consensus report on the aesthetic use of onabotulinum toxin A.J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018 Oct;17(5):719-730. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12729. Epub 2018 Aug 9. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018. PMID: 30091253
Cited by
-
Quantitative assessment of the long-term efficacy and safety of a 1064-nm picosecond laser with fractionated microlens array in the treatment of enlarged pores in Asians: A case-control study.Lasers Surg Med. 2022 Mar;54(3):348-354. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23449. Epub 2021 Jul 7. Lasers Surg Med. 2022. PMID: 34233039 Free PMC article.
-
Proactive Aesthetic Strategies: Evaluating the Preventive Role of Botulinum Toxin in Facial Aging.Muscles. 2025 Aug 13;4(3):31. doi: 10.3390/muscles4030031. Muscles. 2025. PMID: 40843918 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Botulinum Treatment of Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity: The Double-Face of the Neurotoxin.Toxins (Basel). 2019 Oct 24;11(11):614. doi: 10.3390/toxins11110614. Toxins (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31652991 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Patient Journey in Facial Aesthetics: Findings from a European Consensus Meeting on Improving the Quality of Life for Patients Receiving Botulinum Toxin Injections.Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024 Feb 2;17:329-337. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S446891. eCollection 2024. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024. PMID: 38327550 Free PMC article.
-
Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Compared to Conventional Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Meta-Analysis.J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 23;2022:3022672. doi: 10.1155/2022/3022672. eCollection 2022. J Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 36051276 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous