Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 19;99(11):838-840.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.11.008.

[Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for accessory renal artery among patients suspected of renal artery stenosis]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations

[Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for accessory renal artery among patients suspected of renal artery stenosis]

[Article in Chinese]
N Ma et al. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of accessory renal artery (ARA) in patients suspected of renal artery stenosis. Methods: Cases were derived from patients suspected diagnosis of renal artery stenosis during October 2017 and July 2018 by CEUS.A total of 28 kidneys with ARA in 25 cases were diagnosed by dynamic continuous observation by two ultrasound physicians separately. If there was disagreement, the superior physician would made the judgment. DSA or CTA examination was performed at the same period, and its consistency with CEUS diagnosis of ARA was analyzed. Results: DSA or CTA identified RAS in 32 ARA, color-coded duplex ultrasonography (CCDS) in 12 and CEUS in 28. The sensitivity in detecting ARA was 37.5% for CCDS and 84.4% for CEUS, the specificity was 0% for CCDS and 94.4% for CEUS, while the accuracy was significantly different with CCDS compared with CEUS (60.0% vs 88.0%). Thus, CEUS significantly improved the ARA detection rate compared with CCDS (84.4% vs 37.5%, χ(2)=15.56, P<0.01). Compared with CTA or DSA, CEUS showed good consistency in ARA diagnosis (kappa value was 0.752, P<0.05). Conclusion: CEUS can display and evaluate ARA in real time accurately, which provides a new technology for further clinical research of ARA.

目的: 探讨超声造影(CEUS)技术评价疑诊肾动脉狭窄患者副肾动脉(ARA)的应用价值。 方法: 回顾性分析2017年10月至2018年7月因疑诊肾动脉狭窄在北京医院行CEUS检查的146例患者,其中25例患者共28个肾脏经CEUS动态持续观察诊断存在ARA,CEUS由两名超声医师分别独立诊断,意见不一致时请上级医师判断。同期行DSA或CTA检查,对比分析其与CEUS诊断ARA一致性。 结果: 25例患者(50个肾脏)经CTA或DSA检查(金标准)发现ARA共32条,普通超声和CEUS分别检出12条和28条ARA,二者诊断ARA的敏感度分别为37.5%(12/32)和84.4%(27/32),特异度为0(0/18)和94.4%(17/18),诊断符合率为60.0%(30/50)和88.0%(44/50),故CEUS较常规超声对ARA检出率显著提高(84.4%比37.5%,χ(2)=15.56,P<0.01),CEUS与CTA、DSA对ARA诊断具有较好一致性(kappa值为0.752,P<0.05)。 结论: CEUS能够实时、准确显示并评估ARA,为进一步研究ARA临床价值提供了一种新方法。.

Keywords: Accessory renal artery; Diagnosis; Ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources