Addressing misconceptions of fast mapping in adults
- PMID: 30894061
- DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2019.1593955
Addressing misconceptions of fast mapping in adults
Abstract
Studies of fast mapping (FM) in adults have included both positive results and failures to replicate. I argue that although conflicting studies warrant caution, FM findings are nonetheless promising and intriguing. I separate the issue into distinct questions: whether FM has hippocampal independence, and whether it has unique cognitive consequences. I clarify some misunderstandings and identify limitations that may contribute to failures to find learning from FM in some amnesic patients. Finally, I argue that the array of behavioral findings in healthy adults is consistent with computational and neural models.
Keywords: Learning; amnesia; fast mapping; hippocampus; lexical; memory; neocortex; words.
Comment in
-
Response to commentaries on our review of Fast Mapping in adults.Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Jul-Oct;10(4):237-240. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2019.1651709. Epub 2019 Aug 9. Cogn Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31394963 Free PMC article.
Comment on
-
Little evidence for Fast Mapping (FM) in adults: A review and discussion.Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Jul-Oct;10(4):196-209. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2018.1542376. Epub 2018 Nov 19. Cogn Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 30451079 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources