Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Mar 20;19(1):65.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0702-3.

Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies

Siân Harrison  1 , Jane Henderson  2 , Fiona Alderdice  2 , Maria A Quigley  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies

Siân Harrison et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: Surveys are established methods for collecting population data that are unavailable from other sources; however, response rates to surveys are declining. A number of methods have been identified to increase survey returns yet response rates remain low. This paper evaluates the impact of five selected methods on the response rate to pilot surveys, conducted prior to a large-scale National Maternity Survey in England.

Methods: The pilot national maternity surveys were cross-sectional population-based questionnaire surveys of women who were three months postpartum selected at random from birth registrations. Women received a postal questionnaire, which they could complete on paper, online or verbally over the telephone. An initial pilot survey was conducted (pilot 1, n = 1000) to which the response rate was lower than expected. Therefore, a further pilot survey was conducted (pilot 2, n = 2000) using additional selected methods with the specific aim of increasing the response rate. The additional selected methods used for all women in pilot 2 were: pre-notification, a shorter questionnaire, more personable survey materials, an additional reminder, and inclusion of quick response (QR) codes to enable faster access to the online version of the survey. To assess the impact of the selected methods, response rates to pilot surveys 1 and 2 were compared.

Results: The response rate increased significantly from 28.7% in pilot 1 to 33.1% in pilot 2 (+ 4.4%, 95%CI:0.88-7.83, p = 0.02). Analysis of weekly returns according to time from initial and reminder mail-outs suggests that this increase was largely due to the additional reminder. Most respondents completed the paper questionnaire rather than taking part online or over the telephone in both pilot surveys. However, the overall response to the online questionnaire almost doubled from 1.8% in pilot 1 to 3.5% in pilot 2, corresponding to an absolute difference of 1.7% (95%CI:0.45-2.81, p = 0.01), suggesting that QR codes might have facilitated online participation.

Conclusions: Declining survey response rates may be ameliorated with the use of selected methods. Further studies should evaluate the effectiveness of each of these methods using randomised controlled trials and identify novel strategies for engaging populations in survey research.

Keywords: Maternity care; Postnatal care; Pregnancy; Questionnaire; Response rate; Survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was given by Yorkshire and Humber - Sheffield NRES Committee (REC reference: 16/YH/0412). Return of the questionnaire was taken as indicating consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cumulative weekly response rates to pilot surveys 1 and 2
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Weekly response rates to pilot surveys 1 and 2
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. National Research Council. Nonresponse in Social Science Surveys: A Research Agenda. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013. 10.17226/18293
    1. Redshaw M, Rowe R, Hockley C, Brocklehurst P. Recorded delivery: a national survey of women’s experience of maternity care 2006. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit; 2007. https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/downloads/files/reports/Maternity-Survey-Repor... Maternity-Survey-Report.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2018.
    1. Redshaw M, Heikkila K. Delivered with care: a national survey of women’s experience of maternity care 2010. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit; 2010. https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/downloads/files/reports/Maternity-Survey-Repor.... Accessed 2 May 2018.
    1. Redshaw M, Henderson J. Safely delivered: a national survey of women’s experience of maternity care 2014. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit; 2014.https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/downloads/files/reports/Safely%20delivered%20N.... Accessed 2 May 2018.
    1. McAndrew F, Thompson J, Fellows L, Large A, Speed M, Renfrew MJ. Infant feeding survey 2010: health and social care information Centre; 2012. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20180328130852tf_/http://conte.... Accessed 2 May 2018.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources