Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1986 Jul 12;293(6539):97-9.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6539.97.

Influence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity on respiratory function during chronic beta blockade: comparison of propranolol and pindolol

Clinical Trial

Influence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity on respiratory function during chronic beta blockade: comparison of propranolol and pindolol

R J Northcote et al. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). .

Abstract

The long term effect of beta blockers and the influence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity on respiratory function were assessed in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris randomised to receive treatment with propranolol (n = 21) or pindolol (n = 19) for one year. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) had fallen by a mean of 240 ml after one year (p less than 0.001) in those treated with propranolol compared with 120 ml in those treated with pindolol (p less than 0.05). The difference between the groups was significant (p less than 0.01). Vital capacity fell significantly only in those treated with propranolol (p less than 0.05 at one year). In those in whom the basal ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity was low (less than 70%) propranolol, but not pindolol, caused a significant (p less than 0.05) fall in FEV1 throughout treatment. Long term administration of pindolol has a less adverse effect on respiratory function than propranolol, which results in a progressive deterioration in respiratory function over one year.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1966 Sep 15;275(11):580-4 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1964 Jul 4;2(7349):1-4 - PubMed
    1. Br J Anaesth. 1967 Dec;39(12):919-26 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1969 Jul 19;3(5663):143-5 - PubMed
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1971 Apr;103(4):503-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources