Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 20;9(1):4894.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41281-3.

Honey bee colony performance and health are enhanced by apiary proximity to US Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) lands

Affiliations

Honey bee colony performance and health are enhanced by apiary proximity to US Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) lands

Vincent A Ricigliano et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Honey bee colony performance and health are intimately linked to the foraging environment. Recent evidence suggests that the US Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) has a positive impact on environmental suitability for supporting honey bee apiaries. However, relatively little is known about the influence of habitat conservation efforts on honey bee colony health. Identifying specific factors that influence bee health at the colony level incorporates longitudinal monitoring of physiology across diverse environments. Using a pooled-sampling method to overcome individual variation, we monitored colony-level molecular biomarkers during critical pre- and post-winter time points. Major categories of colony health (nutrition, oxidative stress resistance, and immunity) were impacted by apiary site. In general, apiaries within foraging distance of CRP lands showed improved performance and higher gene expression of vitellogenin (vg), a nutritionally regulated protein with central storage and regulatory functions. Mirroring vg levels, gene transcripts encoding antioxidant enzymes and immune-related proteins were typically higher in colonies exposed to CRP environments. Our study highlights the potential of CRP lands to improve pollinator health and the utility of colony-level molecular diagnostics to assess environmental suitability for honey bees.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Total adult bee mass and capped brood production of colonies from different apiary sites. Black horizontal lines indicate the mean. For each performance measure and evaluation time point, different letters indicate statistically significant differences (see Supplementary Fig. S1 for detailed statistical information).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative colony-level expression of vitellogenin (vg) and vg-like homologs (vg-like-a and vg-like-b). Black horizontal lines indicate the mean. For each transcript and evaluation time point, different letters indicate statistically significant differences (see Supplementary Fig. S3 for detailed statistical information).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship between total adult bee mass and vitellogenin (vg) expression.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relative colony-level expression of antioxidant enzyme transcripts. Black horizontal lines indicate the mean. For each transcript and evaluation time point, different letters indicate statistically significant differences (see Supplementary Fig. S4 for detailed statistical information).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relative colony-level expression of immune gene transcripts. Black horizontal lines indicate the mean. For each transcript and evaluation time point, different letters indicate statistically significant differences (see Supplementary Fig. S5 for detailed statistical information).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thomann M, Imbert E, Devaux C, Cheptou P-O. Flowering plants under global pollinator decline. Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18:353–359. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.04.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Devaux C, Lepers C, Porcher E. Constraints imposed by pollinator behaviour on the ecology and evolution of plant mating systems. J. Evol. Biol. 2014;27:1413–1430. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12380. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Calderone NW. Insect pollinated crops, insect pollinators and US agriculture: trend analysis of aggregate data for the period 1992-2009. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037235. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cane, J. H. & Tepedino, V. J. Causes and Extent of Declines among Native North American Invertebrate Pollinators: Detection, Evidence, and Consequences. Conserv. Ecol. 5 (2001).
    1. Power AG. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 2010;365:2959–2971. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types