Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;11(1):90-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Aug 3.

Incidence of root canal treatment of second molars following adjacent impacted third molar extraction

Yener Oguz  1 , Sidika Sinem Soydan  1 , Emel Olga Onay  2 , Secil Cubuk  1
Affiliations

Incidence of root canal treatment of second molars following adjacent impacted third molar extraction

Yener Oguz et al. J Dent Sci. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Background/purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of requirement for root canal treatment of adjacent second molars following the surgical extraction of an impacted third molar.

Materials and methods: The dental records of 6323 consecutive patients who had impacted third molars removed surgically were evaluated and the incidence of postoperative root canal treatment requirement of adjacent second molars was determined. Patients who required root canal treatment of neighboring second molars were accepted as the study group, while the remaining patients were accepted as a control group. Sex, age at the time of the operation, localization of third molar, the depth of impaction, angulation of the tooth, and the professional experience of the surgeon performing the operation were evaluated from patient records.

Results: The incidence of requirement of root canal treatment for second molars following a neighboring impacted third molar extraction was 0.17% (11/6323) and invariably occurred in the mandible. The mean age of the study group was found to be significantly higher than the control group (31 years vs. 23 years). The years of professional experience of the surgeons was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group.

Conclusion: Although the incidence is minimal, iatrogenic subluxation injuries occurring during the surgical removal of impacted third molars can lead to pulpal complications and a requirement for root canal treatment of adjacent second molars.

Keywords: acute apical periodontitis; impacted third molar; retained third molar; root canal treatment; second molars; surgical complication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersson L., Andreasen J.O. Traumatic dental injuries. In: Andersson L., editor. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Willey-Blackwell; West Sussex, UK: 2010. pp. 799–816.
    1. Lysell L. Current concept and strategies for third molar surgery. In: Andersson L., editor. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Willey-Blackwell; West Sussex, UK: 2010. pp. 195–215.
    1. Krausz A.A., Machtei E.E., Peled M. Effects of lower third molar extraction on attachment level and alveolar bone height of the adjacent second molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34:756–760. - PubMed
    1. Goodsell J.F. An overview of the third molar problem. Quintessence Int Dent Dig. 1977;8:11–18. - PubMed
    1. Barnett F. The role of endodontics in the treatment of luxated permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2002;18:47–56. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources